• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

CHP forced to remove Lane Splitting Guidelines-Need your help now!

nickb

Unfair weather rider
Joined
Nov 18, 2005
Location
Vallejo
Moto(s)
2 x B12, FZ1, SV650 project
Name
Nick B.
BARF perks
AMA#: 734668
**ADMIN EDIT -- E PETITION Needs your signature find it in This Post*** END***

Sucks. Don't really know what else to say. Thanks to the AMA for posting the story.

http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/NewsView/14-07-18/Lone_complaint_forces_CHP_to_remove_lane-splitting_guidelines_from_website.aspx

Lone complaint forces CHP to remove lane-splitting guidelines from website
July 18, 2014

PICKERINGTON, Ohio -- A single complaint from a Sacramento man has forced the California Highway Patrol and other state government agencies to remove information from their websites that was intended to help motorcyclists safely execute the allowed lane-splitting maneuver.

Kenneth Mandler, a longtime state employee who now conducts training sessions on how to get a state job, petitioned the California Office of Administrative Law in 2013, claiming the CHP created an "underground regulation" by formulating and distributing guidelines for safe lane splitting.

Lane splitting, also called lane filtering, is the practice of riding a motorcycle or scooter between lanes of stopped or slowly moving traffic. The practice has been permitted in California for decades and no statute prohibits it. No other state allows the maneuver.

The CHP posted its guidelines with the intention of helping motorcyclists and motorists understand safe practices and to discourage unsafe lane splitting.

"Some have interpreted the recently published Motorcycle Lane Splitting Guidelines as rules, laws or regulations that could or would be enforced by the department," according to a CHP statement. "The guidelines were never intended for this purpose and were prepared simply as common sense traffic safety tips and to raise public awareness."

The Office of Administrative Law sided with Mandler, noting that CHP Commissioner J. A. Farrow certified that his department would not "issue, use, enforce, or attempt to enforce the public education information." The OAL determined that posting the guidelines on the website was "issuing" them.

"By forcing the California Highway Patrol to remove its guidelines, Mr. Mandler and the Office of Administrative Law are denying the public vital safety information," said Nick Haris, AMA western states representative and a member of the California Motorcyclist Safety Program Advisory Committee, which helped write the guidelines.

"Lane splitting is still allowed, and motorcyclists are still using this long-recognized riding technique to relieve traffic congestion and improve safety," Haris said. "But now, neither riders nor motorists have a place to turn for authoritative guidelines on the practice."

The AMA supports the continued use of safe lane splitting in California and the implementation of lane-splitting laws in other states, coupled with extensive rider and driver education programs.

The AMA position statement reads, in part: "Reducing a motorcyclist's exposure to vehicles that are frequently accelerating and decelerating on congested roadways can be one way to reduce front- and rear-end collisions for those most vulnerable in traffic."

Denny Kobza, of the Bay Area Riders' Forum and a member of the California Motorcyclist Safety Program Advisory Committee, said he was extremely disappointed that the CHP was forced to take down the guidelines.

"It is very disturbing that one person can affect three years of hard work," Kobza said. "We put a lot of hard work into those guidelines, because lane splitting is a safer way to go than waiting for a motorist to make a mistake."

Kobza said he has full faith in the California Highway Patrol's continued advocacy for motorcycle safety, and he hopes the guidelines can be reposted to state government websites soon.

The complete AMA lane splitting position statement is available here: http://americanmotorcyclist.com/Rights/PositionStatements/LaneSplitting.aspx.

The deleted CHP guidelines can still be downloaded here: http://americanmotorcyclist.com/Lib...esplitting_guidelines.sflb.ashx?download=true.
 
In the meanwhile, call them "suggestions" or "best practices" and put 'em back up.
 
Mr. Mandler should be receiving emailed complaints about his complaint in 3... 2... 1...




(Thanks for fighting the fight, Budman!)
 
:laughing one of those types that gets all butthurt whenever they suspect that somebody somewhere might be having more fun than them
 
What a pest, if anyone gets injured or killed as a result of his actions he should be liable for that.
 
The Four R's or “Be-Attitudes” of Lane Splitting:
Be Reasonable, be Responsible, be Respectful, be aware of all Roadway and traffic
conditions.

- Reasonable means not more than 10 MPH faster than traffic flow and not over 39 MPH.

- You are Responsible for your own safety and decisions.
• Don't put yourself in dangerous positions.
• If you can't fit, don't split.

- Be Respectful --- sharing the road goes both ways.
• Don't rely on loud pipes to keep you safe, loud pipes often startle people and poison the attitude of car drivers toward motorcyclists.
• Other vehicles are not required to make space for motorcycles to lane split.

- Roadways and traffic can be hazardous.
• uneven pavement
• wide trucks
• distracted drivers
• weather conditions
• curves
• etc.


In my recent return as a 2-wheeled commuter, many of my discussions have been about lane sharing. Most of the feed back I got was the speed at which we lane share. Most cagers hate the deltas at which bikes go by >15mph or when they go by while said cager is already going 70-75 with same >15mph delta.

I go across the Bay Bridge and every day, I see sharing at speeds above 39mph.

If one person can have this much impact on a State, we all need to ban together and make this practice acceptable to the majority of cagers as well so that said 1 complainer is so much the minority to decision makers that he receives a letter that says "thank you for your feedback, and we will look into the matter, until such a time, please keep in mind that lane sharing is legal." or something to that effect.
 
Ken Mandler is what's wrong with so much of the CA system. He uses it to fill his pockets and now looks like he want to screw with the CHP and motorcycle riders. I wonder why??

Below is an article my Mr. Mandler:

Land a State Job and Become an Instant Millionaire By Ken Mandler

It’s a tough job saving for retirement. Most of us have difficulty even putting away $500-1000 a year in our retirement accounts. And when the car breaks down — that money goes as well!

Others have access to 401(k) programs at work and employers sometimes match the contributions with up to $4-5,000/year. Then again, during bad profit or no profit years, the employers utilize that ubiquitous phrase subject to change” and provide no match. Or they merge and change the “plan”.

But California state government employees have an employer who regularly and by law provides a $40-50,000 contribution to each employee’s pension account — year in and year out — good budget times and bad. (And in bad years they borrow the money!)

The California state government provides a “defined benefit” pension plan to each of its employees. Such “defined benefit” pension plans are far more generous than any 401(k) or defined contribution pension plan available from any other employer in the state! In fact, the plan is so generous that it makes the average state employee a millionaire after only 22 years of work!

Here’s how it works. Say you start working for the state at age 41 and retire at 63. The average state employee makes $55,625/year in salary — and that’s before benefits! At the age of 63, you’d be able to retire on 55% of your pay rate — 67.5% if you purchase 5 additional service years at a pretty nominal cost.

That’s 67.5% of your final pay. Let’s say you retire at the average state employee pay rate of $55,625/year — your annual pension for life would be $37,546/year. Currently state employees are saving $1.8 billion of their money in the State’s Pooled Money account which pays only 2% per year in interest. However, Let’s say you were able to earn an interest rate of 3% on your retirement account — how much would you have to have in that account to yield an annual benefit for life of $37,546?

Here’s how you calculate that amount — you divide $37,546 by 3% ($37,546/0.03= $1,251,562). To provide this level of annual pension on your own would require you to save $1,251,562 during your 22 year working career between the ages of 41 and 63. Could you do that on your own?

It would require putting $56,889 ($1,251,562/22 years = $56,889) into your 401(k)/IRA or other retirement account every single year during those 22 years! When you work for the state, the state does this for you!

Is the state’s pension plan overly generous? The Sacramento Bee and Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger have been whining about it lately — are they jealous? The state’s own Legislative Analyst has determined that California’s pension plan provides nearly twice the benefit of the next highest state.

Other comparisons are in order. The vast majority of American corporations have now eliminated “defined benefit” pension plans — only 6% of Americans in the private sector have access to such plans.
American companies have terminated over 17,000 such plans in the last 20 years. IBM, one of the bluest of the blue chip companies, terminated its “defined benefit” pension plan in 2005.
Hewlett Packard, a major California employer, followed by terminating its plan later that same year.

You’ve seen the headlines this year about possible changes in the state’s pension plan. However, that shouldn’t stop you from signing up today as your pension is guaranteed the moment you land a state job.
They can change the benefit for future employees — but not you!

Landing a California state government job is not an easy process as everyone wants to be a millionaire! And you are a millionaire the moment you land a state government job. Capitol Weekly’s How to Get a State Job Workshop provides valuable insights into landing a California state government job. Sign up for the August 28th class today!

Ken Mandler teaches a monthly workshop on How to Land a State Job.
The workshop focuses on a variety of tactics and strategies designed to make the state job process an effective one for you. The workshops are 3 hours and include over 400 pages of information for your review. The cost is $84. You can sign up at www.statejobworkshops.com or by calling Ken Mandler at (916) 443-6788 today. You can e-mail Ken Mandler at ken.mandler(at)capitolweekly.net.
 
Sucks. Don't really know what else to say. Thanks to the AMA for posting the story.

http://www.americanmotorcyclist.com/NewsView/14-07-18/Lone_complaint_forces_CHP_to_remove_lane-splitting_guidelines_from_website.aspx

Lone complaint forces CHP to remove lane-splitting guidelines from website
July 18, 2014

PICKERINGTON, Ohio -- A single complaint from a Sacramento man has forced the California Highway Patrol and other state government agencies to remove information from their websites that was intended to help motorcyclists safely execute the allowed lane-splitting maneuver.

Kenneth Mandler, a longtime state employee who now conducts training sessions on how to get a state job, petitioned the California Office of Administrative Law in 2013, claiming the CHP created an "underground regulation" by formulating and distributing guidelines for safe lane splitting.

Lane splitting, also called lane filtering, is the practice of riding a motorcycle or scooter between lanes of stopped or slowly moving traffic. The practice has been permitted in California for decades and no statute prohibits it. No other state allows the maneuver.

The CHP posted its guidelines with the intention of helping motorcyclists and motorists understand safe practices and to discourage unsafe lane splitting.

"Some have interpreted the recently published Motorcycle Lane Splitting Guidelines as rules, laws or regulations that could or would be enforced by the department," according to a CHP statement. "The guidelines were never intended for this purpose and were prepared simply as common sense traffic safety tips and to raise public awareness."

The Office of Administrative Law sided with Mandler, noting that CHP Commissioner J. A. Farrow certified that his department would not "issue, use, enforce, or attempt to enforce the public education information." The OAL determined that posting the guidelines on the website was "issuing" them.

"By forcing the California Highway Patrol to remove its guidelines, Mr. Mandler and the Office of Administrative Law are denying the public vital safety information," said Nick Haris, AMA western states representative and a member of the California Motorcyclist Safety Program Advisory Committee, which helped write the guidelines.

"Lane splitting is still allowed, and motorcyclists are still using this long-recognized riding technique to relieve traffic congestion and improve safety," Haris said. "But now, neither riders nor motorists have a place to turn for authoritative guidelines on the practice."

The AMA supports the continued use of safe lane splitting in California and the implementation of lane-splitting laws in other states, coupled with extensive rider and driver education programs.

The AMA position statement reads, in part: "Reducing a motorcyclist's exposure to vehicles that are frequently accelerating and decelerating on congested roadways can be one way to reduce front- and rear-end collisions for those most vulnerable in traffic."

Denny Kobza, of the Bay Area Riders' Forum and a member of the California Motorcyclist Safety Program Advisory Committee, said he was extremely disappointed that the CHP was forced to take down the guidelines.

"It is very disturbing that one person can affect three years of hard work," Kobza said. "We put a lot of hard work into those guidelines, because lane splitting is a safer way to go than waiting for a motorist to make a mistake."

Kobza said he has full faith in the California Highway Patrol's continued advocacy for motorcycle safety, and he hopes the guidelines can be reposted to state government websites soon.

The complete AMA lane splitting position statement is available here: http://americanmotorcyclist.com/Rights/PositionStatements/LaneSplitting.aspx.

The deleted CHP guidelines can still be downloaded here: http://americanmotorcyclist.com/Lib...esplitting_guidelines.sflb.ashx?download=true.

Let's hear it for Denny... :party
 
"Kenneth Mandler, a longtime state employee who now conducts training sessions on how to get a state job, petitioned the California Office of Administrative Law in 2013, claiming the CHP created an "underground regulation" by formulating and distributing guidelines for safe lane splitting."

Why did he do this and what was his motivation? I smell a rat.

""Some have interpreted the recently published Motorcycle Lane Splitting Guidelines as rules, laws or regulations that could or would be enforced by the department," according to a CHP statement. "The guidelines were never intended for this purpose and were prepared simply as common sense traffic safety tips and to raise public awareness.""

That might be true, but it could be equally true that some might view the removal of the guidelines as a statement about the legality of lane sharing and feel a lot more comfortable perpetuating their outdated and unsafe opinions about lane sharing.

"The Office of Administrative Law sided with Mandler, noting that CHP Commissioner J. A. Farrow certified that his department would not "issue, use, enforce, or attempt to enforce the public education information." The OAL determined that posting the guidelines on the website was "issuing" them."

I disagree, there is a lot of information that is posted on gov. websites that isn't "law". If all of it were to be removed the gov. would crawl to a halt.

""By forcing the California Highway Patrol to remove its guidelines, Mr. Man
dler and the Office of Administrative Law are denying the public vital safety information," said Nick Haris, AMA western states representative and a member of the California Motorcyclist Safety Program Advisory Committee, which helped write the guidelines.""

It goes further than that. See my previous comment. This action also kills any argument that ends with "You're wrong, it's actually on the CHP website. Feel free to check it out."


""Lane splitting is still allowed, and motorcyclists are still using this long-recognized riding technique to relieve traffic congestion and improve safety," Haris said. "But now, neither riders nor motorists have a place to turn for authoritative guidelines on the practice.""

Yup.
 
Last edited:
YAY DENNYYY!!! :twofinger
 
so california is the only state that allows lane sharing?

"No other state allows the maneuver"
 
My question is why did the CHP even comply in removing the guidelines? Its just a complaint, not an order.
 
My question is why did the CHP even comply in removing the guidelines? Its just a complaint, not an order.

Probably because Mr. Mandler had the same expression as your avatar when bikes laneplit...ah, excuse me, laneshared past him while he was stuck in traffic during that hot, hot Sacramento commute. :laughing
 
Pan Handler Mandler.

Just another get rich quick on someone else's dime loser with time to file complaints for every crack he sees.:thumbdown

He accomplished nothing beyond perhaps potentially endangering or killing people in the future for lack of good info....so good job Mr Man.:thumbdown
 
What a douchebag.

What legitimate gripe could he possibly have with guidelines? Agree that there are tons of information on gov websites that are not laws.

Google reveals a facebook page from Sac. I wonder if he would get a fb message or if it goes to spam?

1622650_593918654019147_1348782587_n.jpg
 
Back
Top