I sold cars for a few months some years ago; maybe I can shed some light on this.
People come into car dealers and I think the mentality is that if they're going to spend 5 figures on a thing they'll likely have for 5-10 years, it should offer incredible value and have no drawbacks or limitations at all. It has to do everything--fit 6 passengers, get great mileage, be really comfortable, look awesome and sexy and on and on.
But as people invest more time in the process, they start realizing every car has limitations and drawbacks, and eventually they settle for the thing that best meets their needs and budgets.
So when people casually glance at any EV, the disadvantages are glaring because they don't yet understand the advantages that outweigh the disadvantages. So even though most of the critics here and elsewhere have 2, 3, 4, fuck it, even 20 other vehicles they can get around in, they don't understand why you'd buy a car that doesn't do everything. Hence comments like, "when it has a 500-mile range I'll consider it."
I love the guys with American-made sportscars that cost $60,000 or more to buy new that depreciate to like 15% of their MSRP after 5 years and declare that a $35,000 EV is too expensive and that nobody will buy it. [EDIT--looks like Camaros and Corvettes hold more like 30-50% of the value, so sorry]
Oh, the wait list is now over 300,000 for the model 3...