-
There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.
Nation-wide climate strike by students
- Thread starter Climber
- Start date
If you can’t figure it out, I wouldn’t want to confuse you more than you already are.
Ah the "If you can't figure out my vague ramblings you are the stupid one." Excuse.
Last edited:
Brown81
Well-known member
Ah the "If you can't figure out my vague ramblings you are the stupid one." Excuse.
Ahh, the ole “I can’t read plain English and even if I could, I have no point to make after quoting someone, so I’ll just act smug instead and try to play it off”.
gixxerjeff
Optimistic Underdog
It got political. Happens every time.
tuxumino
Purrfect
what did you expect from over the hill boomers?
OMG we fucked over the young ones, I'll stop driving to walmart for cheap Chinese shit.
Not to brag, but I bought a 3 dollar bottle of wine at Walmart for one frickin dollar a couple days ago! True story, and a compelling counterpoint to those questioning the benefits of civilization!
What can't I read? Your strawman about some politicians (plural) that made some movies (plural) and got all their information from the scientists and that we listen to a girl "instead" of aforementioned politicians?
Which politicians? Who the fuck knows. Which movies? Who the fuck knows. Which scientists? Who the fuck knows.
Could it be Al Gore as Blankpage suggested? Well you used plural for politicians. Also he preaches same thing as that girl, as far as I know. Yet in your post you said that we don't listen to politicians and instead we listen to girl. Which means they say different thing. So can't be him.
Which point would you like me to make about some vague strawman? You have posted jack shit, and then got all but hurt when asked about it, and jumped directly to insulting me.
Smug? Shit this is what I posted, and what set you off:
or maybe this?
Well I guess now we have to wait breathlessly in the hopes of him gracing us again with his presence to clarify his "cryptic" message.
Holy fuck.
I think you are projecting there dude.
Last edited:
I think you are right in overall assessment about it being dismissive about pro climate change, but then he also used instead in second paragraph. Ah fuck it. Just another poorly worded talking points regurgitation.
Blankpage
alien
To be fair the Englass may have been pain but under cross examination that post would not stand up in court.
Brown81
Well-known member
Removed for Political Content
Last edited by a moderator:
Brokenlink
Well-known member
Did you have a point or are you disputing any of the information being provided by any of these people (kids, scientists, politicians), or are you just trying to be a contrarian?
Because right now, all I can see that you said is that we shouldn't listen to the scientists, or the politicians, or the kids. Who should we listen to? You?
Again, do you have something to say or are you just dismissing people because you don't agree (without saying why or pointing to any alternative evidence).
Because right now, all I can see that you said is that we shouldn't listen to the scientists, or the politicians, or the kids. Who should we listen to? You?
Again, do you have something to say or are you just dismissing people because you don't agree (without saying why or pointing to any alternative evidence).
Come down and breath.
Maybe don't use a plural when discussing one person, and don't get all but hurt when comments are made in levity. Just a suggestion next time you post some generic rambling.
Last edited:
Brokenlink
Well-known member
Come down and breath.
Maybe don't use a plural when discussing one person, and don't get all but hurt when comments are made in levity. Just a suggestion next time you post some generic rambling.
On an unrelated note, it is now appropriate to use the plural when discussing the singular so as not to offend anyone with a non-binary gender thing.
I was reading an article about a husband and wife that are in disagreement over whether their three year old is transgendered or not. The article kept referring to the child as them and their, instead of him/her. And while I applaud that, it certainly is confusing to some of us. I had no idea who the article was talking about half the time.
Ah well maybe that is what Brown was doing. Didn't realize he was so on cutting edge of usage of plural for non-binary gender.
Brokenlink
Well-known member
Ah well maybe that is what Brown was doing. Didn't realize he was so on cutting edge of usage of plural for non-binary gender.
I'm sure that's exactly what THEY were doing.
Brown81
Well-known member
Brown81
Well-known member
Come down and breath.
Maybe don't use a plural when discussing one person, and don't get all but hurt when comments are made in levity. Just a suggestion next time you post some generic rambling.
I love this look.
It says everything about you, and nothing about me.
Brokenlink
Well-known member
I made a clear point in the first post. You just failed to understand it.
You mean this one? As i asked, what was your point? Because all it says "don't listen to people." Which then makes me ask "Why should I listen to you?"
Yet here I am asking if you actually have something to add because I am willing to listen. But if all you are going to do is say "I had a point in my first point, you just failed to understand it."
That is lazy and disrespectful. The least you could do is actually have an argument or something to say. Otherwise it's just "neener neener." So I ask again, what was your point?