DaveT319
Marquez FTW
I also want to say this: I don't want to see ANYONE lumping Toe or Joe in with Chris. Just because they are/were friends DOESN'T mean they have a responsibility to right their friend's wrongs. If they CHOOSE to confront Chris over this, then that's up to them, and I would applaud them for doing so. Conversely, I will NOT condemn them if they choose NOT to confront him. It's their choice.
The bottom line here is that Chris needs to either make this right, or explain himself. To come on here and say "I don't have to defend myself" is absurd. You are being charged with stealing something from a great friend of this board, so you need to do more than that. If you have a right to the bike, prove it. But the fact that you have ignored Daniela for all this time and have not paid her more than the original $300 (who in their right mind thinks that $300 is a reasonable amount for a brand new bike?!) tells me that you KNOW you're in the wrong, and you need to correct this before you find yourself in court.
Again, do NOT implicate Toe and Joe with this piece of shit. They are NOT "guilty by association". Nor do they have an obligation to correct the situation.
The bottom line here is that Chris needs to either make this right, or explain himself. To come on here and say "I don't have to defend myself" is absurd. You are being charged with stealing something from a great friend of this board, so you need to do more than that. If you have a right to the bike, prove it. But the fact that you have ignored Daniela for all this time and have not paid her more than the original $300 (who in their right mind thinks that $300 is a reasonable amount for a brand new bike?!) tells me that you KNOW you're in the wrong, and you need to correct this before you find yourself in court.
Again, do NOT implicate Toe and Joe with this piece of shit. They are NOT "guilty by association". Nor do they have an obligation to correct the situation.

