• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Apollo Moon Landing Hoax Theories Debunked

auntiebling said:
you sound fun. i'll bite...
Click to expand...

oh I am fun. let's play.


auntiebling said:
the far more advanced technology we have now is part of the reason we don't need to go back. unmanned gizmos can be built to do everything humans can do.
Click to expand...

makes no sense and disagree about gizmos being able to do "everything" humans can do.

pick up a rock-check
look around-check
call AAA when your ride breaks down leaving you stranded a mile from the only ride home while your Oxygen runs out- check
perform minor analysis on the spot-check
Click to expand...

lmao - is this how human archaeologists, geologists and all the other Earth science -ologists have conducted research on this planet? is that how they excavate ancient sites or find/unearth complete brontosaurus skeletons? you make things sound rather simple. conveniently so. in the grand scheme of our existence in the universe, how does our stupid-close moon not deserve more attention? waiting for a good answer - anyone at all.

auntiebling said:
proximity is a pretty poor reason to return somewhere. next time you're bored, maybe go to the kitchen and see if it interests you? if not, try the living room again?
Click to expand...

what? you're comparing rooms in your own house, that you know like the back of your hand... to exploring "strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before"!? :rolleyes on second thought, I guess the kitchen could actually qualify for some guys lolz

auntiebling said:
the primary reason we went to the moon was politics and propaganda, coldwar bullshit to beat the USSR. when JFK announced "we;re going to the moon" the collective response of the scientific community was "uh, WTF!"
Click to expand...

exactly. hope you realize that only helps to make the case for those who think the moon landing was fake.

auntiebling said:
you don't have to put boots on the ground to Explore something. the moon has been under constant scrutiny since Whats His Name that italian guy pointed his telescope skyward during the renaissance. it's cold, has been hit by a bunch of stuff that left craters behind, the far side is far more pockmarked than the side we see and it's been mapped, remapped, and mapped again.
Click to expand...

f yeah. all the moon is good for is a gnarly track for our RC dune buggies to rip around on.

auntiebling said:
and there you go jumping into NonSequitursville. there's quite a bit of waste in nasa too. waste is a good reason to Stop Manned Missions, as they take longer to plan/execute and cost way more to begin with. generally speaking, the bigger the initial budget, the more of it will be wasted
Click to expand...

again, this makes no sense whatsoever given my previous arguments. but clearly i'm alone in my logic - as I often am in this place. all good!
 
redruM said:
lmao - is this how human archaeologists, geologists and all the other Earth science -ologists have conducted research on this planet? is that how they excavate ancient sites or find/unearth complete brontosaurus skeletons? you make things sound rather simple. conveniently so. in the grand scheme of our existence in the universe, how does our stupid-close moon not deserve more attention? waiting for a good answer - anyone at all.
Click to expand...

The moon being a dead rock, with no geologic processes or life, there isn't much use for archaeologists or paleontologists up there.
 
tzrider said:
The moon being a dead rock, with no geologic processes or life, there isn't much use for archaeologists or paleontologists up there.
Click to expand...

I wasn't suggesting that archaeology/paleontology would be relevant on the moon. But it's odd that so many people seem content with never going back again - as if it's impossible for us to learn anything via other applied sciences... you know, cuz we planted a flag, a mirror, pillaged a few rocks and broke long-jump records. Plus... how do you know what the moon is and isn't? Have you been there? Or are you just going by what you've been told...
 
Last edited:
EjGlows said:
Russian Space Dog:
107j1w7.jpg
Click to expand...

Ftfy. :nerd

tzrider said:
The moon being a dead rock, with no geologic processes or life, there isn't much use for archaeologists or paleontologists up there.
Click to expand...

Actually there is seismic lunar activity, just very little of it compared to earth's. :)
 
redruM said:
I wasn't suggesting that archaeology/paleontology would be relevant on the moon. But it's odd that so many people seem content with never going back again - as if it's impossible for us to learn anything via other applied sciences... you know, cuz we planted a flag, a mirror, pillaged a few rocks and broke long-jump records.
Click to expand...

It seems that we got a lot of mileage out of the samples taken, photos and whatever data they gathered on the missions. As others have mentioned, a big motive was beating the Russians to the moon and you can only do that once. After it was clear they had no intention of going there too, there weren't a lot of practical reasons that were worth the cost.
 
redruM said:
makes no sense and disagree about gizmos being able to do "everything" humans can do.
Click to expand...
how does it make no sense. you might as well be screaming Potato!

lmao - is this how human archaeologists, geologists and all the other Earth science -ologists have conducted research on this planet? is that how they excavate ancient sites or find/unearth complete brontosaurus skeletons? you make things sound rather simple. conveniently so. in the grand scheme of our existence in the universe, how does our stupid-close moon not deserve more attention? waiting for a good answer - anyone at all.
Click to expand...

auntiebling said:
perform minor analysis on the spot-check[/qoute]

why did you leave off the last point?

in short, yes that's what archaeologists do. they frequently send robots to do it On Earth Too!! it's simply too dangerous to send people into a volcano, or deep into the ocean, or into unknown reaches of geographic/geologic features. the real information comes from analysis back in a lab setting after sometimes decades of study. such study has been conducted since the moon missions started here on earth with samples returned from the missions. sofar, there haven't been any discoveries meriting a return to find corroborating evidence. Mars has such evidence, collected on site and analyzed by robots, so there's reason to pursue return trips.

what? you're comparing rooms in your own house, that you know like the back of your hand... to exploring "strange new worlds, to seek out new life and new civilizations, to boldly go where no man has gone before"!? :rolleyes on second thought, I guess the kitchen could actually qualify for some guys lolz
Click to expand...
yes, i'm giving simplified examples of places i don't return to when i'm looking for something new and different because the moon is not the location where one will find anything strange, there is no life and therefore no civilization and we've been there before. it appears we agree on this point.


exactly. hope you realize that only helps to make the case for those who think the moon landing was fake.
Click to expand...
it might, but the mountain of evidence to the contrary is pretty tough to refute.

f yeah. all the moon is good for is a gnarly track for our RC dune buggies to rip around on.
Click to expand...
i like it for tide pool exploring, romantic walks on the beach, and making whiskey. if i could get there i'd totally do some dounts in the sea of tranquility though. that would be sweet.

again, this makes no sense whatsoever given my previous arguments. but clearly i'm alone in my logic - as I often am in this place. all good!
Click to expand...

your agument of "we're wasting money over there, so we should waste it over here instead" is the one that makes no sense.

why don't we not waste money and discover shit as cheaply and efficiently as possible, sending disposable durable machines to distant reaches of the galaxy to let us know if there is anything worth sending a meatbot out to investigate further?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
redruM said:
I wasn't suggesting that archaeology/paleontology would be relevant on the moon. But it's odd that so many people seem content with never going back again - as if it's impossible for us to learn anything via other applied sciences... you know, cuz we planted a flag, a mirror, pillaged a few rocks and broke long-jump records. Plus... how do you know what the moon is and isn't? Have you been there? Or are you just going by what you've been told...
Click to expand...

Nobody here said NEVER go back. They just said there is no reason to now vs the cost.
 
i dont know if he did but it looks like he grabbed something to clinch his fist around before punching him. not brass knuckles but maybe a lighter or something?
 
all of your points are valid... within the context of official narrative. as with many subjects, I've learned to question official narrative - not because I enjoy being rebellious or argumentative - but because verifiable history compels me to do so.

the fact that we went to the moon 45 years ago for "politics & propaganda" reminds me of all the other fuckery that has gone on and continues to go on by the gov(corp)media complex... steering public sentiment and lives any which way they desire.

if they manipulate news media, why should I not believe they manipulate academic realms?

[youtube]5ED63A_hcd0[/youtube]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top