What exactly is your angle here? All I see is a bunch of passive aggressive bullshit.
Is it your position that residents don’t have a valid complaint?
yes, I’m rejecting their premise.
here’s my premise, briefly restated from post #7:
“was there any pushback on the questionable premise that the area is routinely treated as “a race track”?
“as an example of what my mild point is (that the residents of the area
just wish that people like me never go into “their” neighborhoods), here’s a single year of Hwy 17 stats:
Annual Fatalities & Collisions on Highway 17
• 2025: 606 total collisions, 222 injury collisions, and 5 fatal collisions.
“so, comparable with the stats the locals had to go back five years to accrue?
“the other mild point I’d make is that the CHP knows that it’s mostly a NIMBY issue, because if things were truly, statistically, out of hand, they wouldn’t be trying to address the issue by obtaining grants for increased enforcement?
“iow, imo, the CHP is simply making an effort to be seem as being responsive to the complaints of the locals?”
and the other point I’d make, now, (which also supports my mild premise) is to recall the story Mr budman told in post #1 about how he was treated in the meeting by LE, or whoever, when he was doing what he does, because he’s awesome (showing up irl and representing), and was handing someone his card, and was not treated very well, imo, until he had to do a secret LE handshake and drop some names, and only then felt like he was able to make a better connection.
be that as it may … thanks for calling me on my “passive aggressive bs.” as you know, I defer to you in all matters of BARF comportment and try to follow your example wrt empathy, which always appears so very proper and well placed.
when I grow up I hope to put aside passive, and simply come across as aggressive—but clearly I have work to do in that regard.
