• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

An article on female orgasm

asthmodeus said:
my point was that a lot of people learn, erroneously, about sex from porn, hence the fact that seemingly intelligent people think that there is some magic, undiscovered organ on a woman that can perform this, when in actuality it's not a mystery organ...it's a bladder
Click to expand...
z
What? You dont believe in Katie Morgan Sex Tips??? It's on at least once a week.
 
asthmodeus said:
my point was that a lot of people learn, erroneously, about sex from porn, hence the fact that seemingly intelligent people think that there is some magic, undiscovered organ on a woman that can perform this, when in actuality it's not a mystery organ...it's a bladder
Click to expand...


Despite many, far more tasty, youthful opportunities, I learned about it in depth, so to speak, from a crazy, older, as in 35yo, women with 4 kids. uh huh uh huh.
If woman wants to come, or squirt, or whatever, she will. If she don't want to come, and just wants to watch you work it, buddy, get yours and go. Thats not porn, thats reality.
 
Last edited:
jt2 said:
Appreciated. Slinging snark is only fun when there isn't a TOS to deal with.




The article pretty clearly lays out that there are two distinct forms that any emissions take (three if you count the faked-up porn version): Purely glandular and, well, urine. It isn't really that much of an intellectual jump to think that it isn't a clear either/or and there is a spectrum in between.

Both the wikipedia article and the abstract of the article say pretty much the same thing - and that the subject is very much not settled, even among so-called experts, each side citing studies to support their case.




Means that there isn't a clear conclusion. :p If you can't disprove a hypothesis it doesn't mean it is true.
Click to expand...

i would agree with that if urination was a hypothesis.
 
asthmodeus said:
You have that backwards, as in it's mostly pee with some contents from the skenes and bartholin glands, but a few gynos disagree. Most say there is no way such small, mucus producing glands can release copious amounts of fluid.
Click to expand...

asthmodeus said:
yeah, still waiting.
Click to expand...
Wow, you've been waiting for a bit...but I'll indulge you.

You base your point of view on an article in Cosmopolitan, an alleged relationship with an OB/GYN, and that someone once peed on your face.

Not credible as far as establishing a fact goes. Others have had other experiences.

Sorry, but I don't think you're any authority on female orgasms, assmo. Stick with the internet aspect of life, at least you'll feel like you're winning...
 
MysterYvil said:
Wow, you've been waiting for a bit...but I'll indulge you.

You base your point of view on an article in Cosmopolitan, an alleged relationship with an OB/GYN, and that someone once peed on your face.

Not credible as far as establishing a fact goes. Others have had other experiences.

Sorry, but I don't think you're any authority on female orgasms, assmo. Stick with the internet aspect of life, at least you'll feel like you're winning...
Click to expand...

you are an authority on poor comprehension- it wasn't my face that got the waterworks, and whatever experience you have had, if some magic fluid squirted out of your favorite snatch, i can assure you it was mostly piss. sorry if you can't handle the truth, and i posted a lot more sources than fuckin' cosmo, incidentally.

back to your bullshit, half-baked sniping, cicero.
 
Last edited:
Not as much research as there should be on female anatomy and sexual response (ironically); for comparison, scientists didn't discover that the clitoris has an entire subsurface band of erectile tissue until 1992. There's plenty in there to discover yet.

Still, there's plenty of legit sci evidence that a. a "female prostate" exists, and b. it produces ejaculate that is distinct from urine. Not to mention, you know, my own physical concrete experience, with my own damn body and those of others. :laughing

Psych Today article on the history of scientists and the G Spot, beginning in 1672 and Regnier de Graaf, through Grafenberg and Skene and so forth. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/shameless-woman/201209/g-spot-amnesia-or-350-years-rediscovery

There's also the entire body of work of Dr. Milan Zaviacic, who has devoted his career to (successfully) finding tissue and hormonal evidence of the female prostate. His research has helped women who were being erroneously treated for urinary incontinence.

Another article on the female prostate and its ejaculate, "The Female Prostate: The Newly Recognized Organ of the Female Genitourinary System". Quote: "The existence of the human female prostate had been a controversial topic in modern urological medicine, frequently ignored, or thought it was a vestigial organ. Today this perception is antiquated, recent investigations recognize it as a functional gland capable of performing the same functions as the male prostate gland." http://www.scribd.com/doc/42970145/...ized-Organ-of-the-Female-Genitourinary-System

Another scientific lit review on the subject: http://mackiller.tripod.com/femaleejaculationlp.pdf

And another article, from the Electronic Journal Of Human Sexuality. Quote: "Analyses of the specimens showed that concentrations of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) were significantly higher while concentrations of urea and creatinine, primary components of urine, were significantly lower in the four expulsion specimens than in three urine specimens from the same subject. The authors concluded that, 'the dissimilarity of chemical composition of the orgasmic expulsion and urine specimens indicates that the expulsion in this subject was not a manifestation of urinary incontinence.' They also hypothesized that 'the expulsion is largely a glandular secretion' and that, 'the PAP suggests that at least part of the glandular secretion came from prostatic tissue.'"
http://www.ejhs.org/volume4/Schubach/Chap2.html

Or check out RN Sheri Winston's book on the subject, _Women's Anatomy of Arousal_. Very complete and scientifically accurate, as well as amusing, take on the subject. http://www.amazon.com/Womens-Anatomy-Arousal-Sheri-Winston/dp/057803395X

Or you could read Deborah Sundahl's 2003 book on female ejaculation, _Female Ejaculation and the G Spot_: http://www.amazon.com/Female-Ejacul...=UTF8&qid=1418585975&sr=1-2&keywords=zaviacic

Female ejaculation is a thing for plenty of folks; there's variation between individuals, and many women, including me and several friends/lovers of mine can do it just fine. And piss play is fine if that's your thing, but ejaculation is quite distinct. You know it when you taste it. :staRang
 
Last edited:
Why is the female orgasm such a fascinating well studied subject that can be a beautiful thing to see. Elusive thrilling adventure.

Meanwhile you ladies just tickle our balls at the right moment and we just grunt a bit and makes odd faces?

:x
 
Nemo Brinker said:
Not as much research as there should be on female anatomy and sexual response (ironically); for comparison, scientists didn't discover that the clitoris has an entire subsurface band of erectile tissue until 1992. There's plenty in there to discover yet.

Still, there's plenty of legit sci evidence that a. a "female prostate" exists, and b. it produces ejaculate that is distinct from urine. Not to mention, you know, my own physical concrete experience, with my own damn body and those of others. :laughing

Psych Today article on the history of scientists and the G Spot, beginning in 1672 and Regnier de Graaf, through Grafenberg and Skene and so forth. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/shameless-woman/201209/g-spot-amnesia-or-350-years-rediscovery

There's also the entire body of work of Dr. Milan Zaviacic, who has devoted his career to (successfully) finding tissue and hormonal evidence of the female prostate. His research has helped women who were being erroneously treated for urinary incontinence.

Another article on the female prostate and its ejaculate, "The Female Prostate: The Newly Recognized Organ of the Female Genitourinary System". Quote: "The existence of the human female prostate had been a controversial topic in modern urological medicine, frequently ignored, or thought it was a vestigial organ. Today this perception is antiquated, recent investigations recognize it as a functional gland capable of performing the same functions as the male prostate gland." http://www.scribd.com/doc/42970145/...ized-Organ-of-the-Female-Genitourinary-System

Another scientific lit review on the subject: http://mackiller.tripod.com/femaleejaculationlp.pdf

And another article, from the Electronic Journal Of Human Sexuality. Quote: "Analyses of the specimens showed that concentrations of prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP) were significantly higher while concentrations of urea and creatinine, primary components of urine, were significantly lower in the four expulsion specimens than in three urine specimens from the same subject. The authors concluded that, 'the dissimilarity of chemical composition of the orgasmic expulsion and urine specimens indicates that the expulsion in this subject was not a manifestation of urinary incontinence.' They also hypothesized that 'the expulsion is largely a glandular secretion' and that, 'the PAP suggests that at least part of the glandular secretion came from prostatic tissue.'"
http://www.ejhs.org/volume4/Schubach/Chap2.html

Or check out RN Sheri Winston's book on the subject, _Women's Anatomy of Arousal_. Very complete and scientifically accurate, as well as amusing, take on the subject. http://www.amazon.com/Womens-Anatomy-Arousal-Sheri-Winston/dp/057803395X

Or you could read Deborah Sundahl's 2003 book on female ejaculation, _Female Ejaculation and the G Spot_: http://www.amazon.com/Female-Ejacul...=UTF8&qid=1418585975&sr=1-2&keywords=zaviacic

Female ejaculation is a thing for plenty of folks; there's variation between individuals, and many women, including me and several friends/lovers of mine can do it just fine. And piss play is fine if that's your thing, but ejaculation is quite distinct. You know it when you taste it. :staRang
Click to expand...

ok, listen up. almost everything you posted there as a reference is based in psychology and what is not is completely dubious. in fact, this-
unaccredited institution run by psychologists/sexologists said:
No direct connection has been conclusively established between vaginal expulsions, the Gräfenberg spot, and urethral ducts and glands. However, while these are three distinct entities, most of the previous researchers saw the possibility of some interconnectedness, if for no other reasons than their physical proximity and the anecdotal reports of women.
Click to expand...
is the first paragraph of one of your sources.

what i posted is the consensus of the american congress of ob/gyn's, via the american journal of ob/gyn. until you collectively convince them that other than some different components of said ejaculate (the urethral kind, not the glandular kind) isn't basically urine, then conversation is moot. and it's totally fine- it doesn't personally bother me; i just have to inject some truth here. unfortunately 'squirting' is just in most cases just a fetish that many feminists believe is a construct propagated by males. please don't make me research that claim :laughing

and don't think just because i'm a guy that i don't know what i'm talking about or understand the female body. i've laid more pipe in north america than conoco philips :twofinger
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top