JakesKTM said:
Of all the text you wrote this is the only thing that I found insightful and useful about your experience on bikes, because it gets to the core of our differing opinion.
The straight answer is: My son and daughter (I have both) can ride whatever they chose to ride if and when they are old enough to ride street and make that decision for themselves. I would certainly "advise" against any bike over 45 hp and leave it at that. WHEN they are old enough to work, earn, save, acquire insurance, take the MSF course and assume the responsibility, then they too are old enough to disregard the old man's advice and get whatever they want.
So if your kid can get financed on an R6, an R1, Hayabusa, you're going to say "well, guess you're responsible enough to get credit, go out and buy it!"?
Honestly, to me, and here we are at the core of our differeing opinions...just because you have the money to do something, doesn't mean that you're ready for the responsibility of owning it. The MSF costs 150$, insurance can be covered under financing, etc. etc.
In this situation, supplanting this young person's question on the BARF forum as one of my own kids' question - If either of them came to me and said Dad, I'm looking at this 1996 GS500 whaddya think, I'm not going to rant about how much fucking better a 250 ninja is and they shold get that. I'm going to say, it looks great son/sweetie, do you like it? I think you made a good choice. Let's go look at it whaddya say?
Depends on the bike. I've got a fair number of friends who have ridden GS500's, never had the pleasure myself, but it seems to me that you're going to end up paying more money for an older bike, simply by the nature of it having more displacement. Given that i'm not going to have the chance to actually look at the bikes with the poster, i'd say that she'd be better off with a newer model over an older model, one that has more parts availibility, fewer miles, hasn't been rebuilt, so on and so forth. If my kid is saying that they want to spend 2k on a bike that's an old beater, i'm not going to turn around say "That's a great choice for a first bike", i'm going to say "That looks like an old beater, let's see what else we can find".
If a friend comes along and rants about a 250 Ninja, I'm not going to flame them and say, don't listen to him/her. However if that person rolls thier fucking eyes at me I'm going to come unglued.....as I did in this thread. I apologize.
That being said, I think you made your fucking point about the 250 Ninja, and flaming/extinguishing other's opinions seems to be your forte. Next time, I'll steer clear.
Cheers. [/B]
I had a few lines where i flamed a bit, and i'm sorry...your comment about not having an opinion until i have owned at least 10 bikes reeks of old man elitism. The rest of it was simply answering the questions you asked me. I ignored the potential cutting tone there, because it's easy to misinterprit things over the internet, and did my best to outline the reasons that i feel that a ninja 250 is a better choice for a first bike than a UJM. You don't seem to have any counterpoint to that. I was really hoping that you could come back and have a post that would explain why i was wrong, but apparently that's not to be.
If my kids (when i have them,

) come to me, I'll explain to them the upsides of the EX250, the upsides of the EX500, and the upsides of the SV650. Of course, by the time i have kids, we'll be talking about something else entirely, i'm sure, but the basic principal will stand. As it is, our OP's price barrier puts an SV650 in good shape or an EX500 in good shape (barring incredible luck) out of her price range. A UJM is a possibility, but for the variety of reasons that i explained above, I feel that she would have a much more positive riding experience on a EX250.
I appreciate that when you started riding the UJM's were the best thing since sliced bread, a huge upgrade over the britbikes of the past, and indeed, your choice of bikes seems to reflect that, but times have changed...
Furthermore, you seem to be entirely incapable of posting a response to any of the reasons that i recommended an EX250. I'd be curious to see why you'd recommend another bike, beyond some idea that she's immediately going to outgrow the 250 over the course of the 2 months that she'd apparently own it.
It does everything you claim it can't do...and i have the experience on one to know. Have you ever ridden one?
Oh and a quick check of craigslist in the 1500-2000 range shows a ninja 250 that appears to be in good shape, and a few other promising bikes, all displacing around 600ccs, a goldwing,

, and an 86 cruiser...I'm aware that a newer bike doesn't automatically mean it's in better shape, but 3-7 years of potential abuse is better than 13-17 years.
Seriously...if there's all these great UJM's floating around, where the hell are they?