Then you should have millions in coverage because the worst you could do is not wrecking Bill's Neon. What if you kill Bill's only child who happened to be driving Bill's Neon?
But then I'd be tried in criminal court for murder, voluntary manslaughter, involuntary manslaughter, etc, and if found guilty, I'd go to jail and no amount of insurance can get me out of there. I could also be tried in civil court --think OJ--, and if found liable for damages in a wrongful death, then I may have garnished wages --again, OJ.
I'm neither an insurance specialist or a lawyer, so by law I cannot dispense legal advice. But I think we view insurances from different points of view.
Don't take me wrong, I want my assets protected, but I see insurance as my responsibility towards fellow citizens in case I cause damages to and/or harm them. If I lose control of my bike, crash through your kitchen window, break your china and send you to a hospital, I want to make sure I can reasonably restore your life to the moment before I arrived in your life. There are no guarantees in life, life is a constant game of rolling the dice, but I can't consciously tell you, "Hey, Ian, I know I fucked up your life, but you're on your own, man, because I earn $6/hour and live in my mom's basement." What kind of a person would I be? A total dead beat irresponsible ass? Do you want that type of guy driving in your neighborhood?
A few years ago, a tenant of ours caused $5K of water damages in our condo. I asked him to use his renter's insurance and he explained he didn't renew it because renter's insurance is for his belongings only and he didn't own much. Wrong answer, and the small claims court also disagreed with him. And renter's insurance is less than $20/month, less than half a tank of gas.
Same for auto insurance. The difference between bare minimum and decent coverage is negligible, less than a cheap movie date. So why risk?
Again, I think we differ in approaches. I trust you have good insurance.