R6andrei
New member
GOW2 more challenging, GOW1, great writing. GOW3 = FAIL.
GOW2 was frustrating as hell. You liked GOW1 for great writing?
. GOW3 gameplay is the best of the series and that is what's important. The graphics are icing on the cake.GOW2 more challenging, GOW1, great writing. GOW3 = FAIL.
. GOW3 gameplay is the best of the series and that is what's important. The graphics are icing on the cake.GOW2 was frustrating as hell. You liked GOW1 for great writing?. GOW3 gameplay is the best of the series and that is what's important. The graphics are icing on the cake.
yeah, i did like GOW1 for it's story, because 3 did not have one. GOW3 was like, "hey, let's just throw this sh*t out there and hope the franchise can carry it." ok, the graphics are nice on 3, but that's the hook.
The hook is that it's the finale to the trilogy. What else did you expect? He is out to end everything (albeit stupidly) and he does so in a somewhat satisfying manner. The gameplay was top notch too.
What exactly are you referring to about throwing shit out there?