Re: Re: FAST Trak lanes and motorcycles
m83eric said:
So let me get cleared up on this... do you have FasTrak account? I hope you have an account with them (in which case you'll have perfect valid case to contest the violation notices).
However, if you do NOT have an account with FasTrak, I don't think you have a very good case. The fact that motorcycles cross the bridges for free during commute hours does NOT constitute your "rights" to use FasTrak lane without an account.
a) I'm not talking about "rights". I don't think I'm anymore or less entitled than anyone else. It isn't a "right" to cross the bridge. Save the high school semantics for others. I admit I used logic, to quote saskoon:
"Isn't carpooling and motorcycling supposed to benifit bridge traffic and make things move more smoothly through the toll plaza? If every carpool in a cage and every motorcycle has to stop in non-fasttrak lanes in order to see the benifits of carpooling, then what the hell is the advantage? It will just create even more stopped traffic when people attempt to carpool. "
Hence, I thought that there was no harm in using that lane during commute hours because: a) I was helping the flow of traffic by not being in the que b) using an economical and efficient vehicle to commute with.
b) $50 is excessive on a $5 toll. Given the salary and cost of paper/electrons, either we're paying someone a huge salary, paying a private company a hefty sum and having the local government collect or it takes way too many man-hours to process each license.
c) The only information for FastTrak is on the web. Not accessable while riding.
So yeah, I was "wrong" in the strict definition of the rules. I'm arguing the excessive fee and illogical rules, not my "guilt".