It's an odd area to have uncontrollable fires. No trees, just grass and brush, plus easily navigable terrain. Can't help but feel like, the way we handle fires today, it wouldn't have gotten out of hand like this.
It's an odd area to have uncontrollable fires. No trees, just grass and brush, plus easily navigable terrain. Can't help but feel like, the way we handle fires today, it wouldn't have gotten out of hand like this.
It's an odd area to have uncontrollable fires. No trees, just grass and brush, plus easily navigable terrain. Can't help but feel like, the way we handle fires today, it wouldn't have gotten out of hand like this.
I don't see any of that as being notably unique over our forest fires. Firefighters are pumped whenever they have an opportunity for a dozer line, because most of the time in the California mountains they don't, and then they're just working on the spot fires after creating breaks. No problems like that with the majority of these areas in texas. I think the more likely scenario is not that a fire at thunderhill is ten times harder to fight than a fire in georgetown, I think it's more likely that they're where we were at twenty years ago. These days, California does not fuck around. We've gotten really good at fighting fires, throwing way bigger efforts at even the smallest fire way faster than we used to.
...!

Isn't the trees so much as the flatness. No windbreaks and no clear defensible line for digging a fire break.
When 2/3 of your state is just a fucked off flat grass field for hundreds of miles in every direction, it can be brutal trying to stop fuel consumption.
I don't see any of that as being notably unique over our forest fires. Firefighters are pumped whenever they have an opportunity for a dozer line, because most of the time in the California mountains they don't, and then they're just working on the spot fires after creating breaks. No problems like that with the majority of these areas in texas. I think the more likely scenario is not that a fire at thunderhill is ten times harder to fight than a fire in georgetown, I think it's more likely that they're where we were at twenty years ago. These days, California does not fuck around. We've gotten really good at fighting fires, throwing way bigger efforts at even the smallest fire way faster than we used to.
There are definitely a lot more now after having so many fires, but I wonder at what wind speed air support is grounded? I came across a couple articles, one said 35mph gusts and one said 50mph. Probably gonna ground the smaller stuff at those speeds?
Barf been spicy lately!
Yeah I definitely don't want to make any type of firefighting sound easy, especially with 35mph gusts. I stand by it though, those don't run out of control with virtually zero containment burning a million plus acres in this state over similar terrain and conditions. Not anymore.


Texas does not have nearly the large number of super tankers that CA does or as many smaller ones. They can be sent there but that takes time which was not had. As Lahaina last year and Colorado the year before, these 60 mph winds pushed the fire super fast and with no hills there to block it as was mentioned. Folks there haven’t had the need before for fire readiness or awareness as places farther west. In days of yore the native Americans regularly burned the dry grass in monumental prairie fires to manage the land. Cooler temps and less wind oughta help now.
Just chatted with my forester daughter who said that the equipment resources are moved nationally according to the on/off fire seasons. I read something like 2 supertankers in TX to 23 in CA and fewer smaller planes too. Definitely hard to believe they don’t have it at the ready. But the characteristics of this one was a mind boggling 150 football fields per hour with warm temps, zero incline, very low humidity in dormant grasses and remarkable winds over 60. She has a program that calculated circa 1300 chains per hour, forester lingo. Now ashes are covered in snow and wind down to 10-15, but still not contained.
This doesn't normally seem like a February problem.
I was thinking you're right, and its true for CA, but I was curious about wildfires in Texas just now, and it seems that the majority of Texas wildfires historically occur between January and May. Who'd have thought? (People who keep track of these sorts of things I guess lol)
https://fire-information-tfsgis.hub.arcgis.com/pages/historical-fire-statistics