• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Mongols keep colors, Mongols happy...

I didn't think the goverment could take their colors, if they did the "Hells Angels" and other outlaw gangs would be next.:|
 
As would the Boy Scouts, the JayCees, the Shriners... etc and any other 'gang' that displays 'colors'.

Violate one groups rights, and you better be ready to back up why you're not violating all the other groups that fall under your classification as well.

Court made the right decision on this.
 
To label a ruling as regrettable seems like a breach of judicial conduct.

No?

Same as the Westborogh Baptist free speech ruling. Everybody hates the "God hates fags" people, but they have the same rights as anybody else.
 
Mongo like sheriff Bart!

Seriously though, the court did the right thing. The name/colors themselves aren't what is doing the illegal activity. But I can't blame the prosecutors for trying either. I see the logic behind it.
 
To label a ruling as regrettable seems like a breach of judicial conduct.

No?

I sort of agree. The bench should be used to uphold the law, not to grandstand your personal opinions. It's unprofessional.
 
Quite the opposite, a judge willing to put the law above his own personal opinions.

Now this I would respect.

Its called a minority report or a dissenting opinion, an explanation of the minority opinions.

"Regrettable" is not a report of dissenting opinions. It is a personal statement that does not belong ih the courtroom or in public reporting.
 
Back
Top