Z3n... By the OP's own statements it $600 not $300. My point is not that $600 vs. $300 should have any impact on your opinion of Dove's action's. The fact that the smaller details presented are not always retained and presented back accurately might, to some give pause that maybe the information told and retold is now no longer a reflection of what actually occurred. Maybe there is more to the story than you have access to or can recall accurately. Thus the best means and place to dispute the facts is indeed in court between the OP and Dove as opposed to Barf.
Reaching a conclusion based on only half the story is maybe not the best approach.
Reaching a conclusion based on only half the story is maybe not the best approach.



