Yeah, the rear half is untriangulated cantilever. Really overloaded area as so many pieces are joined at one spot. Might have been better to move the attachment for the bottom truss back a couple of inches. Could also have been some misalignment that was overlooked when they welded.Don't go nutz trying to figure it out... it maybe just the camera angle but look at the last picture. The rail doesn't look straight. Maybe you designed them that way, maybe they are straight, maybe I'm crazy, maybe it just doesn't matter. Either way I still give it a![]()
Yeah, the rear half is untriangulated cantilever. Really overloaded area as so many pieces are joined at one spot. Might have been better to move the attachment for the bottom truss back a couple of inches. Could also have been some misalignment that was overlooked when they welded.
He fitted the steel, I welded it.
I plan on having a spare swingarm braced, and it'll probably end up black as well.
Also, for gusseting, here's what I plan. Black is existing, blue is welds (some existing, some new), red is gusset.
![]()
That's what my father suggested... he's a structural engineer, but does bridges mostly - rather different subject than a subframe.
the problem is that if I do a full triangle instead of what I show, it's not as strong unless the backside gets welded on, too... and it's rather difficult to get to.
No need to get that complicated. You are doubling up wall-thickness suddenly in that area and will cause a stress-riser. Would be OK if you taper the reinforcement plate thinner at the ends, but that leaves little surface-area for the weld. Just add a gusset under the cantilever arm.Also, for gusseting, here's what I plan. Black is existing, blue is welds (some existing, some new), red is gusset.
![]()
That's what my father suggested... he's a structural engineer, but does bridges mostly - rather different subject than a subframe.