latindane
Learner. EuroPW, NaPS
I followed Jordan Peterson's (a clinical psychologist and professor) issue re: non-gendered pronouns and free speech (unrelated issue), so I stumbled upon his "New Year’s Letter to the World". He makes a statement that I find very interesting, and reminds me of many discussions on religion/atheism here in the KS:
This claim is consistent with the results of some recent research at the UCSB Center for Evolutionary Psychology that I found very interesting; that racial categorization significantly decreases in the presence of alternative coalitional clues, but categorization by sex and age do not...
The motivation for that research was very cool: during our evolutionary-relevant past, meeting a person of a different race was ridiculously unlikely, so it makes no sense for our brain to evolve a specific "race" identifier. Cool stuff.
The central problem of human beings isn’t religion, as the New Atheists insist. It’s tribalism.
This claim is consistent with the results of some recent research at the UCSB Center for Evolutionary Psychology that I found very interesting; that racial categorization significantly decreases in the presence of alternative coalitional clues, but categorization by sex and age do not...
Differences in political opinions: an occasion for calm reflection or a signal that people belong to rival gangs? A new study shows that political opinions engage an evolved system that tracks who is allied with whom, categorizing people by their coalitional alliances. When race does not predict political alliances, this alliance detection system categorizes people as members of rival political parties and starts to ignore race. What's more, racial categorization decreases, but categorization by sex and age do not. This is what you would expect if the mind treats race as an alliance cue...and nothing more. See Constituents of Political Cognition, by David Pietraszewski, Oliver Curry, Michael Bang Petersen, John Tooby, and Leda Cosmides. Click here for the press release and here to read the article.
The motivation for that research was very cool: during our evolutionary-relevant past, meeting a person of a different race was ridiculously unlikely, so it makes no sense for our brain to evolve a specific "race" identifier. Cool stuff.