I asked you before, and you ignored me: Who is making all this money off global warming, and does it compare at all to the money being made by purposefully denying climate change?
I mean, the petro-chemical business makes billions in profit every year and are the major contributors to not only pollution, but climate changer deniers.
Status quo: Chevron et al make billions while denying climate change is real
Change: Who makes all this money through subterfuge?
I'm not denying that there is money to be made, I'm just curious how profitable it is to pay all those scientists to lie and say everything is fine.
Probably just got used to the usual but since its a good honest question:
Chevron has it's hands in companies servicing climate change interests. The scientists (or those that call themselves such for convenience) aren't the ones making all the money and in fact, the true scientists are rarely the recipients of great wealth, others grab that. They are just pawns.
First, the large money funds science to produce the very things attributed to climate change. Anyone denying that is just as a climate change denier is, ignoring the obvious. I want to hear someone argue and support the idea that the things attributed to causing climate change were not created by those working in the fields of science. Lets put that to rest, that is what happened.
Then let someone explain how the people creating all that didn't know what it was doing. Who came up with of all things "clean diesel"? Marketing. Who went along with it? Scientists and the engineers. Why? Money. They have no idea its all a big lie but go along because of a paycheck? That is just an example but one everyone has probably heard about or seen for themselves.
Then start looking at who is involved as oil companies remake themselves into " energy" companies and are the same companies running or heavily investing in "green" energy. Its all the same companies except for the few. Yet, look where the money flows from tax payers to companies promising innovation and a contribution to the great cause of climate change. The very same who sold you the wonders that caused it in the first place.
Who controls, through various means, carbon credits? Let one pollute because another who really didn't doesn't? What a sham and its marketed and swallowed up hook line and sinker. "Oh Smythe, can you tell the boy to turn up the pool heater? It was a tad less than adequate yesterday. By the way George, where shall we luncheon today, Genevea? I had the jet topped off yesterday". Then they make a show of driving a Tesla to the jetport.
The scientists are just tools in all this. No one digs to see where the money flows and for good reason, like other hot buttons of emotionally charged issues anyone even questioning motives gets subjected to attack on any basis except climate change. They get labeled so that the distraction screens any attempt to find motivation and exactly who is in bed with whom.
How often is history re-written? Frequently as it will now be with the discoveries in Europe regarding the origins of humans. The point? This history too, will be re-written but long after those who created the problems have profited from them.
So, does climate change exist? Absolutely. For many thinking stops right there and then as before, gobble up whatever someone is selling to fix a problem created by the seller. Why? Because it is easier to blame everyone else and then send money to those who claim they know what to do. It removes individual responsibility.
I'd match my carbon footprint against anyone who has a platform spouting climate change is the fault of anyone other than themselves and the interests funding their speeches and seminars. But then I don't go to a store, fill a shopping cart with plastic encased food and other items, put them into a reusable shopping bag and scream about plastic bags, the pollution they cause and the carbon used to produce them either.
Climate change exists but the only thing really changing are the names of the interests selling solutions, the companies and people behind it are the same. Look what they got people to believe, that a $100,000+ electric car created awareness and acceptance for e-cars. Right, the commuter upon seeing a Tesla, runs out to buy a Chevy Volt.
