Isn't half of Aikido training learning how to take those falls?
Would it go as smoothly with someone not trained in that discipline?

Ignorant people who watch these vids say stuff like, "oh they just fall over", but when an Aikido practicioner tries to throw you to the ground and you don't allow your body to follow, you WILL be much more hurt than if you took the exaggerated fall.
My friend ALWAYS ends up hurting someone when were at a party and the Aikido talk starts comming out. Someone drunk ass always wants to challenge. They will say "oh yea, well when you do this, what if I do THIS!"
Then all the sudden there's blood.![]()
Yeeeeah not so much.
I did Yoshinkan Aikido for four years, got a black belt. All good times but it doesn't go so smoothly when you're being attacked by someone who isn't either cooperating, drunk, or a clown. Notice how basically everyone is running at him? Try throwing someone who jabbing at you from three feet away. It's not as easy.
Most Aikido practioners I've seen get real comfortable with this mythical running attacker they practice with all the time, and get confused quick when confronted by someone using a kickboxing/grappling style. Which unfortunately is anyone who is actually interested in fighting these days.
+1 In my Okinawan system, you weren't considered a student until you got your Black Belt, and that took a minimum of 4 years (usually at least 5). Prior to that, you were just learning be basics and foundation to become a student.The inability to adapt, compromise and apply technique in a dynamic environment is a shortcoming of the practitioner--regardless of what style they practice. Earning a black belt is only the first step in pursuing mastery--as it merely indicates that you can regurgitate techniques. And given the nature of Aikido, four years is a very short of a time span for an individual to be able to make the critical breakthrough that will allow them to go beyond the confines of kata and the nage-uke dynamics. It's also typically much easier to make the breakthrough in striking forms than it is in grappling forms.
The inability to adapt, compromise and apply technique in a dynamic environment is a shortcoming of the practitioner--regardless of what style they practice. Earning a black belt is only the first step in pursuing mastery--as it merely indicates that you can regurgitate techniques. And given the nature of Aikido, four years is a very short of a time span for an individual to be able to make the critical breakthrough that will allow them to go beyond the confines of kata and the nage-uke dynamics. It's also typically much easier to make the breakthrough in striking forms than it is in grappling forms.
That basically all boils down to "Aikido is a nice pastime, but learn something else if you want to fight people."
I watched the video and identified what was happening through my experience. What are you basing this on?