• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Nation-wide climate strike by students

I have seen people on both "sides" complaining forum mods favor the other side.

I personally had my posts deleted, and apparently I was close to being bapped because I approached magic number 3. Didn't even realized my posts were ptrap or were deleted.

I guess what I am trying to say is take it to some other thread and let's continue this circle jerk about whether climate change bus real or some kind of conspiracy.
 
...

I guess what I am trying to say is take it to some other thread and let's continue this circle jerk about whether climate change bus real or some kind of conspiracy.

It is not a conspiracy, but sure as heck is not my fault, so see no reason to modify my behavior in the hopes of mitigating it. Changing the expectations of a first world lifestyle will have no effect on the expectations of those striving towards it, so why try to adopt a slightly more sustainable lifestyle in the first place? Stupid, impractical, and a sign of weakness in my opinion.
 
Not at all interested in your excuses. I would like the moderators to just do what they promised to do. Or don't do it at all for the whole forum.
What you're currently doing, is IMHO much worse than my honest mistake.

You don't like me because I'm on the other side of the political spectrum, so you're singling me out and trying to get me nailed, because of that political bias.

I don't ever set out to 'nail' people, regardless of their political bent. Not my way.
 
It is not a conspiracy, but sure as heck is not my fault, so see no reason to modify my behavior in the hopes of mitigating it. Changing the expectations of a first world lifestyle will have no effect on the expectations of those striving towards it, so why try to adopt a slightly more sustainable lifestyle in the first place? Stupid, impractical, and a sign of weakness in my opinion.

That's a pretty selfish outlook.
 
It is not a conspiracy, but sure as heck is not my fault, so see no reason to modify my behavior in the hopes of mitigating it. Changing the expectations of a first world lifestyle will have no effect on the expectations of those striving towards it, so why try to adopt a slightly more sustainable lifestyle in the first place? Stupid, impractical, and a sign of weakness in my opinion.

Cool story brah.
 
Cool story brah.

Kinda disrespectful to dismiss my point of view without evaluating it beyond a cursory glance. Maybe the message was between the lines, but every brah deserves the right to be addressed by their full birthright title of dude-brah.
 
Kinda disrespectful to dismiss my point of view without evaluating it beyond a cursory glance. Maybe the message was between the lines, but every brah deserves the right to be addressed by their full birthright title of dude-brah.

Oh you are mistaken. I have evaluated it, and determined that my reply above was more than sufficient.
 
Go figure. Same grouping as in a typical KSP thread and the thread goes to shit. Archiving this data point.
 
:laughing

Solid insult while staying well within the TOS, Berto. You do know how to talk shit in an under-the-breath mutter with a smile on your face. :thumbup
 
I'm not buying your intentionally false statements.

[YOUTUBE]https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dw7qnZ8vrMk[/YOUTUBE]

FYI, when I posted that, it was in response to a post that was so overtly political that I didn't realize I was in the KS at the time. By the time I saw that it was in the regular forum, I had already been quoted, probably to preserve what I had posted, even though it was an honest mistake. Look at the time, that is my bed time, I was tired and reacted to something that gets repeatedly done. My bad.

Interesting that you fixated on mine, but not the one I responded to. Perhaps you're biased, yourself?

Doesn't the Right ever give up?

What Al Gore does has ZERO impact on the facts of Climate Change. ZERO.

When the fuck are people on the Right going to drop that stupid shit? Proving one person was fallable does not prove a fucking thing, and yet the Right does this kind of 'proof' shit over, and over and over again. They are following Rush Limbaugh's play book of proving it once condemns a huge group. That is the dumbest stupid shit in the world, and he had over 30 million people eating that stupid shit up. Think about that for a second. :rofl
 
Last edited:
You posted the original political post, then quoted mine intentionally.

I would have deleted my original post if you hadn't quoted it, once I realized that I had posted that in the KS.

Are you saying that you don't think your post was political, but mine was?
 
NO. I'm saying your a story teller.
https://m.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=222&v=dw7qnZ8vrMk&feature=emb_logo
FYI, when I posted that, it was in response to a post that was so overtly political that I didn't realize I was in the KS at the time. By the time I saw that it was in the regular forum, I had already been quoted, probably to preserve what I had posted, even though it was an honest mistake. Look at the time, that is my bed time, I was tired and reacted to something that gets repeatedly done. My bad.

Interesting that you fixated on mine, but not the one I responded to. Perhaps you're biased, yourself?

Doesn't the Right ever give up?

What Al Gore does has ZERO impact on the facts of Climate Change. ZERO.

When the fuck are people on the Right going to drop that stupid shit? Proving one person was fallable does not prove a fucking thing, and yet the Right does this kind of 'proof' shit over, and over and over again. They are following Rush Limbaugh's play book of proving it once condemns a huge group. That is the dumbest stupid shit in the world, and he had over 30 million people eating that stupid shit up. Think about that for a second. :rofl
 

Bro that's now the 3rd "citation" you've linked that's from an extremist source. :laughing

Media Bias/Fact Check said:
One America News - story selection and mixed for factual reporting due to promotion of conspiracies, lack of sourcing and a few failed fact checks. OANN is one failed fact check away from moving to the Questionable Source list.

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/one-america-news-network/

Also, would you do Bud and the other Mods a favor and stop quoting the post with political content in it? It just creates more work for them later if/when they remove it... not only will they have to remove the OP, but they'll have to remove it from each and every one of YOUR Posts. kthx! :thumbup
 
Poll says otherwise: 3/4 left leaning, 1/4 right leaning. In the KS.

Depends on what you consider the middle is. Somehow I do not envision Kevin's "middle" is in the same zipcode as mine.
:laughing

I don't think I'm old AF yet, but maybe that means I am.
 
^ Apparent you didn't want to be made aware of observations. :ride
https://www.zerohedge.com/s3/files/i...?itok=IeADFFXE
Facebook Glitch Reveals Greta Thunburg's Father Posting As Teenage

_____ hmmm: https://summit.news/2020/01/09/glac...f5TabhtxQGTl5RU_wRzqZyalWbczHX2qZ_59MF68Hykd4 Climate Change

Glacier Park in Montana Set to Remove ‘Glaciers Will All Be Gone By 2020’ Signs

Well, this is awkward.
92bdc8bce676fd1d053262a01af1a3b8


Paul Joseph Watson


090119glacier.jpg



Montana’s Glacier National Park is being forced to remove all signs that read “glaciers will all be gone by 2020,” after the doomsday scenario didn’t happen.
Some of the signs were already removed last year as it became clear the prediction wasn’t going to unfold.
Now the rest of the signs will have to be taken down too.
Glacier National Park spokeswoman Gina Kurzmen “told MTN News that the latest research shows shrinking, but in ways much more complex than what was predicted. Because of this, the park must update all signs around the park stating all glaciers will be melted by 2020,” reports 8KPAX.
Glacier-National-Park-Removes-Signs-2020-750x394.jpg

• In the late 90’s and early 2000s, scientists predicted that man-made global warming would cause melting glaciers, leading to rapidly rising sea levels that would sink coastal cities and towns.
The more dire forecasts have proven to be totally inaccurate and some glaciers are now growing.
Back in June, NASA reported that the Jakobshavn Glacier in western Greenland had thickened and “has grown for the third year in a row.”
The glacier prediction is by no means the only forecast global warming alarmists have got spectacularly wrong.
• At the end of the 70’s, climate experts said that a new ice age was coming. It didn’t happen.
• Paul Erlich’s prediction that hundreds of millions of people would die of starvation due to crop failure by the 1980’s also didn’t happen.
• The 2004 prediction that major European cities would be underwater and that Britain would be plunged into a Siberian climate by 2020 didn’t happen.
Al Gore’s doomsday warning that the Arctic would have ice free summers by 2013 didn’t happen either.
Maybe since these “experts” been caught lying time and time again, should ew stop and question them?

Begs too question . ...What are any predictions worth ?

I thought we were supposed to link articles, rather than copy and paste directly from them. Here is your link, by the way: https://yournews.com/2020/01/09/1392548/glacier-park-in-montana-set-to-remove-glaciers-will-all/

And here is the mediabiasfactcheck rating (tinfoil hat rated) of this website: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/your-news-wire/

Come on man. If you are going to argue a point, at least use some real facts and sources to back it up. Otherwise you are nothing more than a bot, spreading false information: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/your-news-wire/
 
Brokenlink, my posting included the link (others have committed on it.
Your assertion, " Here is your link, by the way: ..//yournews.com " .
Did you pull that out of your .. Imagination?
Come on man. If you are going to argue a point, at least use some real facts and sources to back it up. Otherwise you are nothing more than a bot, spreading false information: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/your-news-wire/
I thought we were supposed to link articles, rather than copy and paste directly from them. Here is your link, by the way: https://yournews.com/2020/01/09/1392548/glacier-park-in-montana-set-to-remove-glaciers-will-all/

And here is the mediabiasfactcheck rating (tinfoil hat rated) of this website: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/your-news-wire/
 
Back
Top