Yes, I agree, and pretty obvious. What in the hell is personally more important that overrides leo on code 3? Unless the LEO was blatantly and unneccessaily risking the lives of others, likely the obvious applies here. Just my 2 cents.
before assuming that she made the turn in front of a code 3 vehicle on purpose, or because she had other things more important than yielding, ponder other reasons.
after seeing some sides to this, I read that the lady is 73 y/o per the reports. senses are dulled at an older age, that is a fact, and the motorcycle was approaching at a high rate of speed. that has also been established, as he was going code 3, in a not too common location relative to the car that was hit.
so rather than hang her high, here is a few more points to think about.
maybe she is hard of hearing? assumption
I don't remember taking a hearing test at the dmv.
but maybe she didn't hear the sirens?
maybe the bike came up on her too fast for her reaction time? assumption
it wasn't said (at least I couldn't find it)whether she had her signal on or not. in which case, it could be a case of wrong place at the wrong time for the officer. If I have my signal,and haven't heard an emergency vehicle, then I assume that the vehicle behind me is taking the necessary actions to not hit me. ie..at fault when you hit someone in front of you, no?
yes, the law says that you have to yield to emergency vehicles, but that is also dependent on when you hear/notice/see them. at a high rate of speed, with a small footprint as motorcycles have, it is still a risky move, and it sucks for all involved. especially if it was just a case of, she didn't see the bike in time.
not condoning this or trying to excuse her, but many factors play a role in motor vehicle crashes, not just one action.
speedy recovery to the cop though. and definitely something to learn for everyone whether they are riding or driving.