tzrider
Write Only User
Huh. Isn't that exactly what a CCW license gives you? The right to carry a firearm to pretty much anywhere that isn't a federal building, school, or private property that explicitly forbids them via signage?
No.
Huh. Isn't that exactly what a CCW license gives you? The right to carry a firearm to pretty much anywhere that isn't a federal building, school, or private property that explicitly forbids them via signage?
What I see with most anti-gun people is that they are projecting their own insecurities and fear of the inanimate object onto other people. They are afraid of what they may do with the gun and think that the rest of us are the same way.
What i see of them is that they are projecting their own insecurity and fear of an extremely powerful inanimate object in the hands of criminals as well as angry law abiding people ready to return fire. 'Friendly' fire.
Keep em where they belong. Home, protecting your castle.
*sorry, unless you're hunting four legged animals..
Angry? Where did this came from? Projecting your own insecurities much?
Mirror. Get one.
Andy - got more time now?
Not sure what you mean. I'm not angry, just a bit grumpy some of the time. I have a gun with me most of the time. Didn't shoot anyone. Do you think there is something wrong with me, because I haven't shoot anyone? Do you think I should seek medical attention to facilitate shooting someone? Because otherwise I don't fit into your stereotype.
Some, but can you just ask me what you want to discuss?
Assuming you've thought this through then, I'd like to hear your reasoning on my other questions aside from "you don't have an automatic right, it's up to you to deal with it".
I'm not arguing against gun ownership. I think you should be able to defend yourself at home.Here's the problem with requiring X amount of training - cost. It's going to cost more money to get proper instructors, more money to keep them working longer hours, more money to the shooter to pay for said instruction, more money for ammo, more money for the simple cost of getting to a place where they actually are willing to teach the course, etc. While I'm not against the idea, I don't see several weekends of training being even remotely feasible.
I truly do not understand why people think only police and military should have guns. Police training is on par with military training in regards to firearms. The only real difference between a soldier/LEO with a gun and a civilian with a gun is training in conflict resolution/stress management, which is far from impossible to obtain/train yourself in.
I'm not arguing against gun ownership. I think you should be able to defend yourself at home.
But most murders are with handguns, and walking around with one is how it starts.
And btw, I think it is impossible to a CCW now. Very difficult would be a big improvement.
Most crime doesn't happen at home. So why restrict someone's ability to defend themselves solely to their residence? I would say walking around with one illegally is how it starts. Most murders committed by people walking around with guns have nothing to do with anything legal.
Would you think it equally presumptuous for someone to carry the same knife they have on them every day into your home?
You find out he's carried into your home before and you never knew because nothing ever happened and life moved on, but now that you know you treat him as a hostile intruder?
I would venture that they probably feel perfectly safe at your house without their gun, but if they carry would you prefer they leave it in their car when they arrive? What about the trip to and from your house? What was the first post in this thread? Most people don't have safes built into their car, and a locked bag is still easy enough to steal if someone chooses. Would you prefer they open that possibility up? Or simply keep it on their hip/back/shoulder/wherever, out of sight and out of mind, and if you didn't ask you'd never know they're carrying? Let life continue as normal?
As I said - it's your prerogative, but give this some thought. No need to throw away a friendship simply because you find out something about that person you dislike. Be a little tolerant of all aspects of your friends lives. They're your friends for a reason right?
Most crime doesn't happen at home. So why restrict someone's ability to defend themselves solely to their residence? I would say walking around with one illegally is how it starts. Most murders committed by people walking around with guns have nothing to do with anything legal.
No one can get a CCW now.
Fixed, to reflect my opinion of the truth.Let's not assume I have thought this through.
...the opposition to private gun ownership looks more and more like traditional anti-gay sentiment: not a reason-based policy, but something growing out of prejudice.

Let's see...don't bring it to my house, you can do it but only in your home, keep it away from the children/public eye.![]()