• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Freeway Protests and Solution? Is there?

No it's just that normally when someone is unhappy about an attack on the 1a, or any amendment, it's because they have great respect for the constitution and of course in order to be consistent, you'd want to feel similarly about all amendments.
 
byke said:
No it's just that normally when someone is unhappy about an attack on the 1a, or any amendment, it's because they have great respect for the constitution and of course in order to be consistent, you'd want to feel similarly about all amendments.
Click to expand...

And I do. :dunno
 
byke said:
No it's just that normally when someone is unhappy about an attack on the 1a, or any amendment, it's because they have great respect for the constitution and of course in order to be consistent, you'd want to feel similarly about all amendments.
Click to expand...



Which amendment protects the rights of looters and criminals?
 
byke said:
Okay, well...you know, the fifth and all that.
Click to expand...

Indeed. Silly Man, do you think I am implying it is the Police who should be resolving the problem of looters? I am not.

The 5th Amendment is quite clear.

No person shall be deprived of property without due process of law.

If you try to take my property, without first gaining the right to take said property in a court of law. The owner of said property has every right to kill the thieves in the process of stealing it. Very simple.

In a perfect world, every brick through a window would be immediately responded to by a bullet to the brain of the offender who threw it. That is the perfect society.
 
Last edited:
Eldritch said:
Indeed. Silly Man, do you think I am implying it is the Police who should be resolving the problem of looters? I am not.

The 5th Amendment is quite clear.

No person shall be deprived of property without due process of law.

If you try to take my property, without first gaining the right to take said property in a court of law. The owner of said property has every right to kill the thieves in the process of stealing it. Very simple.

In a perfect world, every brick through a window would be immediately responded to by a bullet to the brain of the offender who threw it. That is the perfect society.
Click to expand...

That's not going to end well for the property owner.....nowadays!
 
Yeah well passing a fake twenty to a business is stealing. I guess Floyd got what he deserved.
 
byke said:
Yeah well passing a fake twenty to a business is stealing. I guess Floyd got what he deserved.
Click to expand...

Also a gross oversimplification, but essentially, yes.

Do you see now how for men such as me, the one provokes little outrage, but the other invites a very unfortunate response, but is quite philosophically consistent?

If that is not clear, I can further explain if you like.

I tell these stories quite well for those who endeavor to listen, but I will not bother if it is not of interest.
 
Of course I'm interested if it's sincere, though I question whether or not it's a road worth going down if it's based on "The owner of said property has every right to kill the thieves in the process of stealing it. Very simple." because as stated it is neither correct, nor simple, at which time I'd checkout and let you sort it out with one of the resident leo's.
 
buellistic said:
That's not going to end well for the property owner.....nowadays!
Click to expand...

Killing a thief never ends well for the property owner. It is simply a question of what ending is better for her. Violence should never be taken lightly.


byke said:
Of course I'm interested if it's sincere, though I question whether or not it's a road worth going down if it's based on "The owner of said property has every right to kill the thieves in the process of stealing it. Very simple." because as stated it is neither correct, nor simple, at which time I'd checkout and let you sort it out with one of the resident leo's.
Click to expand...

I am quite sincere, but I shall take the breadth of your answer then to be No, I should not bother to further explain the mindset of beings like me.

As you wish.
 
Last edited:
tzrider said:
If that were true, what would there be to protest about?
Click to expand...

The same thing all this protesting is actually about, Class Justice. It is funny most people don't seem to realize this is not about race. It is a class justice struggle hidden in a racial disguise so it will fail.
 
Eldritch said:
Indeed. Silly Man, do you think I am implying it is the Police who should be resolving the problem of looters? I am not.

The 5th Amendment is quite clear.

No person shall be deprived of property without due process of law.

If you try to take my property, without first gaining the right to take said property in a court of law. The owner of said property has every right to kill the thieves in the process of stealing it. Very simple.

In a perfect world, every brick through a window would be immediately responded to by a bullet to the brain of the offender who threw it. That is the perfect society.
Click to expand...

the 5th amendment doesn’t grant you that right.

Eldritch said:
The same thing all this protesting is actually about, Class Justice. It is funny most people don't seem to realize this is not about race. It is a class justice struggle hidden in a racial disguise so it will fail.
Click to expand...

if it fails it will be due to the same challenges the civil rights movement faced ‘OH NO...SCAREY MILITANT BLACK PEOPLE!’. which is a fucking absurd deflection on the face of it.
 
littlebeast said:
if it fails it will be due to the same challenges the civil rights movement faced ‘OH NO...SCAREY MILITANT BLACK PEOPLE!’. which is a fucking absurd deflection on the face of it.
Click to expand...
The first time around, they flipped the script on BLM, the smear machine came out and executed a plan very effectively.

Did people know that WhiteLivesMatter was a white supremacist strategy and execution? They were, of course, aided by antifa, who are assholes but they lumped BLM in with antifa and called them thugs and terrorists when that wasn't true. They also took the tact of being wilfully ignorant of the phrase, turning it into (Only) Black Lives Matter when that wasn't what was meant at all.

I think this time around it will be better interpreted, even though they'll try the same tactics again.
 
I hate to admit that it took me a sec to understand that BLM = Black Lives Matter. In my head, BLM = Bureau of Land Management.

For a second there, I kept wondering if I missed a story another group of white guys with rifles making a stand on some BLM property.
 
wannabe said:
I hate to admit that it took me a sec to understand that BLM = Black Lives Matter. In my head, BLM = Bureau of Land Management.

For a second there, I kept wondering if I missed a story another group of white guys with rifles making a stand on some BLM property.
Click to expand...

Nah, Government backs down when those happen. They know who to actually be afraid of, lol.
 
Eldritch said:
Nah, Government backs down when those happen. They know who to actually be afraid of, lol.
Click to expand...

Yup. Taxpayers who vote.

If you think they're afraid of AR-15s, lemme tell you little story 'bout a man named Saddam...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top