You're misunderstanding the point I'm making. It's about the workers that make them. There's more to assembling a Harley than you'd think.
Sorry, man, you're picking an argument with the wrong guy here. See my post again. Your argument IS my second point, but that's only part of it. The other two points are critical.
First and foremost they price to a market that will pay for it. That's just smart business. Why would you sell a product for less than you have to when you sell out? Blame the customer for the high prices, not the company.
Second, they don't cost that much to make. The numbers are right in their annual report. H-D runs by far the highest gross margin in the business. Honda builds a bike for $10k, sells it to dealer for $12.5k, dealer sells it for $15k. Harley builds a bike for $10k, sells it to dealer for $15k, Dealer sells it for $18k (not including accessories).
The last point (which you describe) is the complexity of building semi custom bikes, which drives higher part cost and labor hours. Both are a function of product decisions. Labor rates are a footnote here. These bikes would cost the same to build in Japan and very close in a non-union shop because that is how you have to build semi-custom bikes.
Again, if you want proof, look at the 883 iron ($8k) for two points. First, it's easy to build a cheap Harley, just eliminate the options. The parts don't cost much. Second, its mfg cost is within (edit: probably) $100 of the forty-eight which sell for $2,500 more. You're looking at value-based pricing, not cost-based. In fact, if I were going to congratulate H-D on their business acumen, it would be on this front, where they are playing chess against the other manufacturer's checkers.