monkeythumpa
When I go slow, I go fast
- Joined
- Aug 13, 2005
- Location
- Oakland, CA
- Moto(s)
- V-Strom 650, XT250, XR50 (son's), KLX110 (other son's) (Past: R1200GS, ZR-7S, V-Star 650, Vulcan 500
- Name
- mnkythmpa
For excellent information on lighting, go here:
http://www.danielsternlighting.com/tech/bulbs/bulbs.html
Check out the entire site.
FYI, PIAA bulbs are a waste of money. Tinting does nothing for the bulb except robbing it of light ouput. There is no such thing as 55w = 110w. If you want the most legal light for your money, get a +50 bulb.
They are the brightest bulbs I have EVER had on any motor vehicle and they are what, $80? Regular bulbs are $10-20? I wouldn't say that the difference in price is unreasonable for what you get. And the physics behind it is also worth a read.
I am picking up retro-reflective glows from signs and cars much further than I normally would. The whole world shines like a Christmas tree on my new bike. There is a difference. I don't know if it is what PIAA claim, but I noticed it.
Way wrong. If the light output was twice as much (and it ain't), they'd be illegal and could not carry the DOT stamp. What you're paying for with PIAA or any other tinted bulb is hype. And shorter bulb life. Tinting reduces light output, among other things, and in order to compensate, they must (or have the option to) start with a bulb with higher output, lumen-wise. This means a bulb with a shorter life span. Then they coat it which brings it down to or under the light output level spec'd by the DOT. Twice the lumens??....hogwash. Read Daniel Stern's piece on blue bulbs.