• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

How will electronics change how bikes are ridden?

Is it going to change the way a track rider is going to ride in order to take full advantage of the electronics and stay competitive?

The MotoGP article I linked says that the riders agree they are faster and safer and safer with TC than they would be without it.

My bikes wouldn't benefit from TC all that much due to their low power nature but even those bikes, in the hands of a new rider, might be easier to learn on with TC.

I wouldn't add TC to my bikes if that were an option.

Adjustable/defeatable TC on the street on a high powered bike would be appreciated by me, I'm sure.
 
The MotoGP article I linked says that the riders agree they are faster and safer and safer with TC than they would be without it.

My bikes wouldn't benefit from TC all that much due to their low power nature but even those bikes, in the hands of a new rider, might be easier to learn on with TC.

I wouldn't add TC to my bikes if that were an option.

Adjustable/defeatable TC on the street on a high powered bike would be appreciated by me, I'm sure.

Why would you want to defeat it on a bike with close to 200hp? And most are adjustable if I'm not mistaken.
 
Why would you want to defeat it on a bike with close to 200hp? And most are adjustable if I'm not mistaken.

Let's just say that I've experienced electronic aids that were best turned off at times as they were far from "invisible" or nuanced in their operation.

Have no experience with TC but I have read that some systems can be overly intrusive.

Mind you I'd never buy a 200hp bike.
 
Thanks GAJ.

I've got a slipper clutch and it's been useless for street riding.

Re: the track...... thinking one would ride a bike w/ all the electronics differently than one without; different breaking points, throttle application etc.
 
I'm glad to read that it's not just me pointing this out - street riders should have a mindset to rely on themselves to watch for danger and be 100% vigilant, and electronic aids that may help shorten stopping distance (ABS does this, lou), keep the bike upright / keep traction on wet or slick surfaces (ABS does this lou) and keep the rear wheelspin under control when necessary (traction control does this lou) gives a street rider the maximum advantage to help you stay upright and possibly out of harm's way. Why you wouldn't want every advantage in street riding situations is beyond me, but hey, some people love ice skating uphill. Obviously skilled braking techniques and experience is another advantage, but ABS is usually good for an "oh shit" situation, where skill only goes so far.


Eagerly awaiting the "those that know are in the know" response.

Umm well, this isn't the only difference in opinion to come up on this motorcycle site.

I don't have "Oh Shit" situations, and I have ridden in rain that filled the air so thick, while under a storm cell in the high country mountain roads, everything lost definition. Everything just was dark gray.

The only thing that made the road appear, was the rapid lightning flashes reflecting off the pavement.... Nothing else was giving that reflection.

I learned how to do the things manually, that you are saying ABS does.

This must be beyond your comprehension... When You don't have the skill, that is very understandable.
 
having been on the r1 forum for over 10 years, I can tell you for a fact that there are way less crashes on the street and track with the 15 model compared to the early models.lol. It has definitely kept many riders from experiencing pain while putting up with their stupidity and lack of skills. In general I think it's great that tech has advanced so much along with design and engineering to create such a masterpiece. But personally for me, it doesn't stir my loins like my 04 and 01 R1. Nothing beats wide open flatsides.
 
Classic unecessary put down. :thumbdown with that I am superior BS.

I have the multi with lots of nannies. So far they are not needed although I did have to back down the TC number as it was robbing power


I could feel it on bumpy shit where the wheel would lose grip because it was in the air.
I have solved thst by lowering it to Enduro setting 2 (almost off).

Digging it, but don't know what that does in higher speed sleepy stuff. I generally ride like I have zero aids. Quite used to not having them. 40 years or so. I am however grateful for the extra safety.

I will not ride like the shit will save me.

I am sure it will save some and enhance some. I think it is the shit. Since they invented the shit. I am happy that it has my back.
 
More stuff I don't want that jacks up the price of the bike. More stuff to possibly malfunction. More stuff to maintain.

+1 on all of the above. And 20 years from now, good luck finding spare parts. (Yes, hobby motorbikes are durable goods that should have well over 20 years of service lifetime.)
 
Agree completely Scotland, on electronics on the street being likely more in need than on the track (for safety)...
I think we agree on almost everything, except letting "I watched videos" race in AFM. :twofinger
One thing that worries me is the failure mode. If some sensor fails, will there be an indication? Some people will get used to relying on it, and when failure occurs if it doesn't show up on panel it can lead to a crash.
Quite possible, imo.
I thought it was... That's why I put it there. I'm not asking you what is acceptable for you.
Classic unecessary put down. :thumbdown with that I am superior BS..
Jeebuz, lou, knock it off! I have the "aids" set to minimums for the street, but my new bike will hug the darn nastiest bumping back road near my mom's house 25 to 30 mph faster than my non-electronic CBR. The S1000RR is a modern marvel in suspension, I tell ya' what. And I will never go back. Ride on into the future, bro. :ride
 
Only thing i'm wondering is will it be better for a new motorcyclist to start with all of these electronics or will this stunt their growth?

Or will a new rider who starts with these electronics become a quicker rider in a shorter amount of time than someone who started without the electronics.
 
Only thing i'm wondering is will it be better for a new motorcyclist to start with all of these electronics or will this stunt their growth?

Or will a new rider who starts with these electronics become a quicker rider in a shorter amount of time than someone who started without the electronics.
I am not sure why TZRider left without responding, because the CSS has stats that say the electronics are better. ME, I think everyone should start on super-small bikes in the dirt, where no one gets hurt and one learns how crazy motorbikes can behave, without any aids.

Some people will never get clutch/shifting/braking all-at-once down. But, some people can't operate a manual car transmission, either. They had automatic transmissions for motorcycles 50 years ago. It seems that this is not a bad idea for those just using a bike for limited commuting/errand use. It would allow the newbie to concentrate on other necessary parts of riding. My first thoughts.
 
Let's just say that I've experienced electronic aids that were best turned off at times as they were far from "invisible" or nuanced in their operation.

Have no experience with TC but I have read that some systems can be overly intrusive.

Mind you I'd never buy a 200hp bike.

Geoff, the 2015 R1 changes much of what's thought of as "rider Aids". The bike pretty much has the equivalent of "stability control" on a 4 wheel vehicle, for a motorcycle. It's not just ABS and TC, it's an entire electronics package that seeks to keep the bike upright...and it's pretty amazing stuff. As a rider takes away lean angle, it allows increasing amount of power to be added back, using bank angle sensors and not slip control. It's quite odd to get used to, at first.

Have the bike leaned over 40 degrees and want to try it out? Firewall the throttle and nothing happens. Want to get more power to the rear tire? Pick the bike up off the corner with the the throttle pinned and power gradually returns to the rear tire. Have the front tire "slip/ push" and the front brake lever is let out slightly and rear brake engaged slightly. It's simply amazing what this new electronics package is over the older ABS/ TC stuff.

Thanks GAJ.

I've got a slipper clutch and it's been useless for street riding.

Re: the track...... thinking one would ride a bike w/ all the electronics differently than one without; different breaking points, throttle application etc.

Slipper clutches are seamless when they're working. If they're really good, you don't even feel them. One of the biggest changes the last few years for track riders and bad habits is the lack of ability to match revs/ blip on a downshift. There are many riders who simply have no idea who to do it correctly nor, know how to slip the clutch on an entry...a super important skill to know.

These new bikes are ridden differently...or rather, need to be ridden differently. Will that change for the street? I'm sure it might as a rider who learns to pin the throttle off the corner with 50 degrees of lean angle may do the same thing on the street..and the bikes will be able to handle it. However, is that rider "skilled"?

Braking points shouldn't change unless the bike actually has better braking equipment (not electronics...that I can see a use for).

having been on the r1 forum for over 10 years, I can tell you for a fact that there are way less crashes on the street and track with the 15 model compared to the early models.lol. It has definitely kept many riders from experiencing pain while putting up with their stupidity and lack of skills. In general I think it's great that tech has advanced so much along with design and engineering to create such a masterpiece. But personally for me, it doesn't stir my loins like my 04 and 01 R1. Nothing beats wide open flatsides.

Interesting indeed. There's two R1's on copart now (hence the reason for this thread). Both are front end collisions.

Only thing i'm wondering is will it be better for a new motorcyclist to start with all of these electronics or will this stunt their growth?

Or will a new rider who starts with these electronics become a quicker rider in a shorter amount of time than someone who started without the electronics.

It should be way easier for a new rider to go fast with the rider aids. However, are they learning how to ride a bike or we just old school in saying such a thing?

Some people will never get clutch/shifting/braking all-at-once down. But, some people can't operate a manual car transmission, either. They had automatic transmissions for motorcycles 50 years ago. It seems that this is not a bad idea for those just using a bike for limited commuting/errand use. It would allow the newbie to concentrate on other necessary parts of riding. My first thoughts.

Auto blippers on the 2015 R1 are yet another thing people can start to forget about learning. See above on the lack of ability to slip clutches.
 
Auto blippers on the 2015 R1 are yet another thing people can start to forget about learning. See above on the lack of ability to slip clutches.
Well, I am glad you are getting a spiff on the R1, but my BMW is not that perfect. I actually like the slipper on my '08 Fireblade better than the S1000RR. So, who knows. Matt Maldin would blip the throttle and slip the clutch, even though his bike was one of the very first with a slipperclutch. Can't argue with that considering the source. I have found that sometimes the slipperclutch is not enough slipper. Three gears down and pop it, and maybe the slipperclutch does its job and maybe not. But, as you have pointed, there is a difference between track and street.

I still think an automatic makes more sense for street riders. This is why it is so hard to find a manual on any street car, anymore. Lowest common demolition denominator. Manufacturers should do it, and then the slipperclutch, auto-blip is moot. :)
 
Umm well, this isn't the only difference in opinion to come up on this motorcycle site.

I don't have "Oh Shit" situations, and I have ridden in rain that filled the air so thick, while under a storm cell in the high country mountain roads, everything lost definition. Everything just was dark gray.

The only thing that made the road appear, was the rapid lightning flashes reflecting off the pavement.... Nothing else was giving that reflection.

I learned how to do the things manually, that you are saying ABS does.

This must be beyond your comprehension... When You don't have the skill, that is very understandable.


oh frak, did this on hwy 188 between Roosevelt and Globe AZ, shoulda waited at the gas station in Roosevelt but no.
Driving rain and lighting in July, there was construction on the road so oily and gravely patches, full on slide through corners using the lightning to see.
Caught up to a cage and stayed there.
Truly had a moment sliding that I thought would be my last, this was on a 02 SV650, soaking wet and scared as hell: half an hour later was in Globe dry as a bone and wishing for more rain to cool me off.

On the street the riders aids will save the more cautious and kill the reckless: on the track the aids will help the less skilled up to a point then oh shit.
 
Only thing i'm wondering is will it be better for a new motorcyclist to start with all of these electronics or will this stunt their growth?

That's a good question to ponder, but we can't uninvent technology. My uncle, long since passed, taught me to ride when I was real young on an old Yamaha two stroke he had. He used to tell me about a bike (don't remember what it was) that had a total loss oil system, he had to remember to give it an extra squirt every now & then while riding. I didn't complain about mixing the gas/oil after that.

Point being, there are sometimes skills that can become obsolete or for the most part, unnecessary. Tech is here and you can choose to let it pass you by, but that alone doesn't make one who uses it a worse rider, or one that doesn't, a better rider.
 
Have to say... Depends on the rider... They don't all come out of the same cookie cutter.
Different people do different(ly) at everything they do.
 
I got to ride the R1M at Thill, pretty slick. I liked the way the front end just came up a bit on the front straight a couple times with zero drama, and actually got the TC working coming out of T6 twice, fun. Two of the faster guys say the brakes are not conducive to super fast laps.
 
Back
Top