• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Kate Middleton's boobs

matt fe2o3

matt fe2o3

New member
Joined
Sep 12, 2011
Location
CA
Moto(s)
Aprilia Caponord
Well after close examination seems the royal family is more embarrassed that they are a poor representation....

I mean they are boobs and all but she looks better with her clothes on. You can get those anywhere. How about a set of stunners!
 
I don't want to see Kate Middleton's boobs. Especially considering the image is from some person with some whack telephoto lens taking voyeuristic photos of a young married couple on their private property.

I always wondered how it was against the law to do that, but it was totally just paparazzi when it's someone in a newspaper.
 
Well somebody has to say it! This thread is useless without pictures!
 
I dont get the fascination with the issue (Princes being photo'd - I defiantly get the fascination with boobs).

I do think it stupid to have that level of global recognition and go out topples - then be appalled someone would take and publish your pic... She was expecting... no one would care?
 
No shit. You're the Princess of Ole Blighty or whatever and you don't have any place you KNOW no one will see you, so you can walk around topless? Duhr. Yeah, the photog is a creep, but you'd think she'd expect that.
 
Well shit. I walked around topless all goddamn weekend, and I don't think anybody took my picture. :(




:boobies
 
I'm not sure what's worse, the scumbag pappazazzi who used slimeball means to take a photo of the woman topless in the assumed privacy on her own property, the creepy magazine editors who paid for the chance to publish them or the bottom feeding wretches who feel the need to view it
 
How about the guy that owns the Italian publication printing a new spread today?
The former Prime Minister of Italy.
Who took drastic actions to prevent pics of his OWN private party getting published?
But is now jumping on the "right to print" bandwagon for the pics of Kate?

Hypocrite!!!!!!!

DM
 
Idontdotrix said:
I'm not sure what's worse, the scumbag pappazazzi who used slimeball means to take a photo of the woman topless in the assumed privacy on her own property, the creepy magazine editors who paid for the chance to publish them or the bottom feeding wretches who feel the need to view it
Click to expand...

The more the royals flip out about the pictures, the higher their price goes.

After Princess Diana died a needless death because of the paparazzi gutter scum, you would think the European Union would have a zero tolerance policy for this type of thing.
 
Idontdotrix said:
I'm not sure what's worse, the scumbag pappazazzi who used slimeball means to take a photo of the woman topless in the assumed privacy on her own property, the creepy magazine editors who paid for the chance to publish them or the bottom feeding wretches who feel the need to view it
Click to expand...

Boo hoo, cry us a river. Boobs have been fair game since man drew them on cave walls thousands of years ago.

What is really funny is women take the advise of men and are embarrassed by them as if they are something dirty that must be covered up.

I think what's worse is dim witted women who march to the tune of oppressive MANagement.

Free the boobs!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top