• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

LEO firearms law exemptions

My service weapon has a magazine disconnect. Nothing new for me.

Why? That should be the 1 gun that is made sure to NOT have it lol

The roster is essentially closed at this point due to the microstamping requirement.

Yeah. Stupid. And people trying to be more stupid with "smart gun" technology that requires a bracelet or some crap to fire. No one should ever do business with that company EVER.
 
Why? That should be the 1 gun that is made sure to NOT have it lol

In the event that we're in a fight, and its possible we'll lose control of the firearm, we can eject the magazine and then the gun becomes just a blunt weapon rather than a firearm.

This happened in Sacramento some time ago. CHP officer arrives on scene of a traffic collision and one of the drivers goes nuts. Driver jumps on the back of officer and officer ejects the magazine, as you can see in the picture below.
 

Attachments

  • qYDnF.jpg
    qYDnF.jpg
    27 KB · Views: 14
In the event that we're in a fight, and its possible we'll lose control of the firearm, we can eject the magazine and then the gun becomes just a blunt weapon rather than a firearm.

This happened in Sacramento some time ago. CHP officer arrives on scene of a traffic collision and one of the drivers goes nuts. Driver jumps on the back of officer and officer ejects the magazine, as you can see in the picture below.

Ok, but what happens when that suspect then pulls away and produces a handgun? I know some other departments do this for the same reason, but I'm not sure that the logic works.
 
Go to our secondary.....

Another pic of the attack:
 

Attachments

  • 1H065.jpg
    1H065.jpg
    28 KB · Views: 9
Ok, but what happens when that suspect then pulls away and produces a handgun? I know some other departments do this for the same reason, but I'm not sure that the logic works.

There is no perfect answer, quit fishing for one.
 
Dude's lucky the Placer fellow didn't put a big hole in his face!
 
Hi Rel!

I could be here all afternoon typing about how that picture is actually demonstrating two officers losing tactical control of an engagement, and are neutering themselves of the primary mechanical advantage a firearm presents in that situation.

If I was the cop, my thumb would not be fumbling around on a magazine latch, but would be stuck as far as physically possible inside the ocular socket, soft nasal tissues, larynx, or any of the other 'last ditch', absolutely are going to cause grievous bodily harm, techniques that are generally frowned upon. And if that incident turned into a Ferguson and I ended up a juror, I'd still come down on the side of the cop!

Anyone wanna go back to my points earlier about nod nod, wink wink... You know, the goodies cops get in their personal lives (assuming they are gunnies), by virtue of the roster? The cops hear *really* believe the roster did what was (laughably) promoted? Let's call a spade a spade. Modern politics revolves around the division of society into a lot of collective interest groups, then setting them up against each other, giving us the illusion of political participation. Cops are very much a special interest group, and each and every exemption received on an individual level is nothing more than your blood money in a corrupt system.

If Lady Liberty must be blinded in order for a civil society to recompense the individual for the natural rights lost in the formation of that civil society, then societal servants must *not* be privileged under the law.

So, I am perfectly happy with no more exemptions for LEO of any form, until I see their representative organizations get out of 2nd amendment politics.
 
In the event that we're in a fight, and its possible we'll lose control of the firearm, we can eject the magazine and then the gun becomes just a blunt weapon rather than a firearm.

This happened in Sacramento some time ago. CHP officer arrives on scene of a traffic collision and one of the drivers goes nuts. Driver jumps on the back of officer and officer ejects the magazine, as you can see in the picture below.

That's pretty crazy I don't remember hearing about that.

With having a secondary that makes sense..
 
In the event that we're in a fight, and its possible we'll lose control of the firearm, we can eject the magazine and then the gun becomes just a blunt weapon rather than a firearm.

This happened in Sacramento some time ago. CHP officer arrives on scene of a traffic collision and one of the drivers goes nuts. Driver jumps on the back of officer and officer ejects the magazine, as you can see in the picture below.

Different departments, different weapons and training I guess. I've never been trained to do that. But then again, I carry a Glock that will fire without a magazine as far as I know. I also carry a backup gun.
 
Hi Rel!

So, I am perfectly happy with no more exemptions for LEO of any form, until I see their representative organizations get out of 2nd amendment politics.

Feel better?

FYI, most cops are very pro second amendment. FYI, most cops don't want to take anyones guns.
 
That may be so Rel, but that is unfortunately not the way the various police unions/associations/etc *behave*.
If most CA cops were genuinely pro-2nd, this wouldn't be happening. So I will read it as I see it. Political payback pure and simple.

And, as always, I hope all the LEO's in this thread have a safe shift today.
 
Feel better?

FYI, most cops are very pro second amendment. FYI, most cops don't want to take anyones guns.

maybe in your sphere of influence/operations, but it is pretty well documented that Las Vegas metro is very against 2nd amendment through their actions, especially north Vegas.
 
That may be so Rel, but that is unfortunately not the way the various police unions/associations/etc *behave*.
If most CA cops were genuinely pro-2nd, this wouldn't be happening. So I will read it as I see it. Political payback pure and simple.

And, as always, I hope all the LEO's in this thread have a safe shift today.

Who do you think is authoring all the gun bills? Not the police unions.
 
Who do you think is authoring all the gun bills? Not the police unions.

Please see my earlier post specifically the bill text of SB15-2000 and all the supporting groups. I am well aware of how the legislative process works, and it is quite frankly disingenuous to suggest y'all didn't actually get a perk.

And that's me done on this one, I'm off to read 1984.
 
Back
Top