SloDuc
Still figuring it out
I'm not sure what you mean by encouraging those under 21. The class is mandatory for them.
Tanks! I wasn't current on that.

I'm not sure what you mean by encouraging those under 21. The class is mandatory for them.

Thats a thing that does NOT make sense to me. You'd think that under 21 would be the more expensive, since younger kids are a little more cockier. What justifies paying more because you're older?
I think the lower price for the young'uns is to encourage them to take the course. Most people under 21 aren't making much money. The lower price makes it easier for them to get the training.
Yeah because us "older" folks with kids,mortgages,health,life,and dental insurance, student loans, 401ks, IRAs ,and collage saving accounts have much more of a deposable income then the high school crowd.
I get what your saying but perhaps they should make it cheaper for all to encourage it for all.
I would gladly pay a few extra bucks for my registration so more people could afford the course.
Or maybe they could offer a BRC for people who own bikes already. They would have less overhead and could pass the savings on to the students.
Oh, BTW, the Experienced Rider Course is only $100, but it doesn't waive the skills test at the DMV.
Please stop and gain more real information. You are working off of hearsay and it is incorrect.
Here is a very basic breakdown:
14-16 motorcycles ($3300-3600 each) (very few are loaned not donated, most are purchased)
Fuel and maintenance of the above.
20 helmets
Ridercoach pay ($20-30hr)
Site Manager pay (None of your business)
Classroom & Range rental (at some locations, this is 50% of the tuitions received)
Rental of the office (duh)
Insurance (yes every bike and student and Ridercoach is insured when taking the class)
Workbooks ($3)
Office staff pay (to enroll and process paperwork)
And more I cannot remember right now.
Also, the reason the course is free to Military Members is that it is required. This is only part of the hundreds of things that Uncle Sam provides for free to the Military.
You are not reading my responses, or you are ignoring them. The skills(wtf?) are not free. Someone is paying for them, it just may not be evident upon enrollment.
Your statement about not needing a permit to take the classes is only partially correct. You need to be able to legally operate a vehicle on the road to be able to attend the class. It could be a permit OR a (automobile) license. One or the other.
ever heard of the economic laws of supply and demand?
how about the fact that everything (land) is more expensive in areas where people actually WANT TO LIVE.
sounds like you should just start your own school, since you have all the knowledge that all the school owner's, who have been in the business for years, are missing![]()
. Yes because a person asking to find a cheaper training program thinks he knows it all.That make sense 
You are fooling yourself if you think that the (Civilian) organization that is providing training on Travis isn't paying rent. You are also way off target if you think that military units are not operating within a budget that Uncle Sam assigns to them. The CO may not write a rent check every month, but it doesn't mean that $ assigned to his unit isn't being spent.There is no class room ,range rental, or Site manager to pay for a class on base. But it still cost the same.The real funny thing is that when you put someone over the age of 21 on those bikes the cost jumps up $100. The military offers it free because they are concerned with safety not because it is mandatory. There is a lot of mandatory military things that my wife and I still pay for.
CA is concerned with motorcycle deaths (notice I didn't say 'safety'), and they are bringing down the cost(s). I can assure you that EVERY facility in the state wants to charge more for the class. Our contract with the State of CA forbids it.My point is if cost of the MSF BRC is $250 per student anywhere in the union and poor rust belt states with cold winters , short riding seasons and less bikers like Ohio and Michigan can offer the class for $25 and $15 on their budgets California should do something similar to bring down the cost if they are concerned with safety.
I agree with the basic thought you have here, but $235 is about as low as I can go and still remain open as a business. The cost of operation in CA is just too high.Yes that is why I was asking about other training. More training options = competitive prices.![]()
Again you are fooling yourself if you think that it's free to the Military because they are concerned with safety. When it all comes down to it, it's $. The Military looses personnel to motorcycles crashes at an alarming rate. They loose a butt-load of money when they cannot use the assets (people) they have trained. THAT is the real reason. If you think that the Military actually cares, then it's painfully obvious that you haven't seen both sides of the Military.
I've seen both sides and the concern with money. The safety and expense is rolled into one.Before you continue commentary about things that you are unclear on, let me give you a little background on myself.
I've been teaching the MSF programs for damn near 19 years now. While I was active duty military, one of my many collateral duties was to manage the Base military motorcycle training course (MSF related). I'm now a civilian that manages a civilian motorcycle facility (MSF related) in the Bay Area. I am also clear on the agreement that Travis AFB has with the civilian organization that provides the training on the base. The owner/manager of that facility is a acquaintance of mine.
The fact of the matter is that EVERYTHING is more expensive in CA. Also, the State of CA has chosen NOT to subsidize the California Motorcycle Safety Program (CMSP) in an effort to lower cost to students. The fact that the cost is less in other states doesn't mean that the course is free/inexpensive/or cheap. Those states are very likely paying the tuition FOR the students. Just because the tuition is lower doesn't mean the student isn't paying for the class in some other way (taxes, registration fees, etc.). Students are paying for it alright, it's just not labeled as 'tuition'.
CA is concerned with motorcycle deaths (notice I didn't say 'safety'), and they are bringing down the cost(s). I can assure you that EVERY facility in the state wants to charge more for the class. Our contract with the State of CA forbids it.
And to use your reference of states with shorter riding seasons...
Could you not then imply that since the total cost of a motorcycle safety program is a lot less, that the legislators would be more willing to fund the program?
hordak, we get it. You are pissed that you have to spend more $ than you want to spend, but until you come up with a knowledgeable fact based argument, all you are really doing is ranting.
In the larger scheme of things, 250 dollars is nothing. In what you'll save in insurance alone should be incentive enough to do and complete a MSC. Hell, your gear will cost more then 250 dollars.
This has been brought up several times in this thread but I just don't see it - I'm insured through Progressive, and they gave me a 10% discount for having the certificate from the BRC, but that was 10% off the liability portion of the insurance only. In the end that worked out to a whopping $2.00 for the year - at that rate the BRC fee will be paid for in what, 125 years? Maybe that's the penalty I pay for having a good driving record and getting full coverage for such a great price?
I think if you're taking the class solely for the reduction in insurance rates you're deluding yourself - take the class increase your knowledge and if you get an insurance break consider it icing on the cake.
It was just an question about other training besides the BRC.
