• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Toyota problems could be electronics

Bang-for-the-buck doesn't just refer to performance in my book. Corvettes are nice cars but they're simply not practical whatsoever. I could at least carry things in my Mustang. My entire stage rig fit in the car, for example. My drummer had a Mustang and his whole drum kit fit in his. You can't do that with a Vette.

That's what a CTS-V is for I guess. OR an SRT-8 Jeep.

BTW, the comments on how to shut off a push button car when in motion are the very reason people have been killed with them. You can't just turn a key (some you push the button 3 times rapidy, others, push and hold...)

Yeah Jason

http://reason.com/blog/2012/02/28/for-fewer-crushed-children-feds-mandate
 
Agree. In fact my dad and I were just having that conversation this weekend. The role and best use of government is to educate NOT regulate...
 
Wow. Yet another situation where I'll step up and say educate and not legislate would've been a better route. But whatever. :rolleyes

God fucking forbid, you hold parents responsible for their children.
 
Or hold drivers responsible for looking where the fuck they're going.

We basically do that enough as it is. I mean with driving laws n such. There's not many laws that directly cover being a parent (other then cruelty and safety). I'm highly thinking there needs to be a Age range, and IQ test.

These fucking Nanny laws are getting ridiculous.
 
Or hold drivers responsible for looking where the fuck they're going.

To be fair, the visibility in most modern cars sucks. I blame this on the pillars having to be large enough to support rollovers, impacts, and airbags. I've never hit anything, ever in 16 years of driving but I probably would if I had something new. Many cars are horrendous-huge blind spots, poor heights for everything. Can't stand it.

Hence I don't own one-I can't see.
 
My chrysler has a pushbutton transmission :party

Ernie may be old enough to know what they are.

Even I know what that is. :laughing

Powerflite transmission. :thumbup

1957ChryslerPowerFlite2.jpg
 
A quick perusal of the Edmunds site shows the V6 Mustang going through the slalom at 67.3mph while the BRZ went through at 69.1.

While I'm sure the BRZ is a sweet handler and better than a V6 Mustang, to say the Mustang falls flat on its face when turning seems a bit inaccurate.

FWIW, the new Mustang 5.0 did the slalom at 70.3 while the Corvette scooted through at 69.7.

I'm not going to get into a Ford/Chevy debate. Both cars are great. Yes, the Mustang live rear axle is antiquated technology, but that doesn't necessarily mean the car won't turn. The Corvette's OHV design is also antiquated, but that doesn't mean it won't rev.

Given the target audience for the BRZ/FR-S I think they missed the mark. There are too many other options with the same or better performance for the same money.

Ah, to be fair, I didn't have the Suba-yota in mind when I said that about the Mustang. They are very different cars to me. The V6 Mustang's I've seen don't handle the track well. The V6 just runs out of oomph on top, and the brakes aren't up to multiple hard stops. The slalom results are interesting to me. I never would have guessed it would have posted those numbers. The only thing I can think of is that their course must be smooth. The Mustangs I have been in do not cope with mid corner bumps very well at all. The Subi-yota is an unknown at this point, but all things point to it being in the same league as the Miata on the track.

As for old school tech, yeah, when the Porsche guys point out the pushrods, I remind them that the car has leaf springs too.
 
The brakes are what one should expect on a $22K car. They're not Corvette brakes. Nor should anyone expect them to be at that price point.
 
One reason for somewhat lackluster performance on the toyobaru is the tires, both size and compound. They're apparently the tires used on Prii in some markets. I'm sure that with some decent rubber, probably a little bigger as well (stock is 215), it'll do WAY better. Hell, I'm sure with decent street tires it'll do way better than hypermiling tires.
 
Agree. In fact my dad and I were just having that conversation this weekend. The role and best use of government is to educate NOT regulate...
Teachers motherfucker ! wait wrong thread

Ahem... If you run over your own kid with your own car backing down your own driveway, we get this stupid shit.
 
Ah, to be fair, I didn't have the Suba-yota in mind when I said that about the Mustang. They are very different cars to me. The V6 Mustang's I've seen don't handle the track well. The V6 just runs out of oomph on top, and the brakes aren't up to multiple hard stops. The slalom results are interesting to me. I never would have guessed it would have posted those numbers. The only thing I can think of is that their course must be smooth. The Mustangs I have been in do not cope with mid corner bumps very well at all. The Subi-yota is an unknown at this point, but all things point to it being in the same league as the Miata on the track.

As for old school tech, yeah, when the Porsche guys point out the pushrods, I remind them that the car has leaf springs too.

Everything you mention about the V6 Mustang is what I've read as well. As Jason says, the brakes are what you'd expect on a 22k car. Yes, it runs out of oomph on the top end. Still, it has >100 ADDITIONAL hp versus the FR-S/BRZ and has similar handling capability.

As for the Mustangs needing smooth pavement. Yes. It IS a live rear axle and you WILL get axle tromp when going over bumps. Given all of that, the car does post M3 like lap times at less than half the price. Plus, it's attainable, functional and almost infinitely customizable. Honestly, the only downsides to the current gen Mustang is the live rear axle (which I think is more than compensated for by the glorious engine) and the fact that they are everywhere.

It seems a bit disingenuous to intentionally give the Mustang shit for the live rear axle and then be fine with the OHV and leaf springs in the Corvette.

But getting back to the Toyota thing and then the BRZ/FR-S thing that this thread has morphed into.....

The original MR2 was cool. The next gen was WAY cool and some of those damn things were FAST.

The Celica was a cool car and a legitimate competitor to the Datsun/Nissan Z cars.

The Supra was a para-supercar that virtually anyone could buy.

What the fuck happened? What did Toyota do? Did upper management call the design team into a meeting and say, "Fuck it. Anything interesting needs to go. We're going to build Camrys and this ugly little shit pile Prius that will make the do-gooder crowd jizz their pants. If you think of a car that has any interesting characteristics you're fired. Meeting adjourned. Get to work."

The final version of the MR2 was ugly and anemic. That thing was so slow it was dangerous. I think a Kia Rio was faster.

The Celica got seriously ugly, then it disappeared.

The Supra.....killed

Toyota starts a youth oriented brand with Scion and all their cars are powered by gerbils running in exercise wheels.

They partner with Subaru and come up with the FR-S/BRZ. They proceed to take a very attractive car and castrate it with regards to performance.

Toyota builds transportation appliances. I, for one, am seriously uninterested.
 
What the fuck happened? What did Toyota do? Did upper management call the design team into a meeting and say, "Fuck it. Anything interesting needs to go. We're going to build Camrys and this ugly little shit pile Prius that will make the do-gooder crowd jizz their pants. If you think of a car that has any interesting characteristics you're fired. Meeting adjourned. Get to work."

Someone saw the dollar signs of sticking with the Camary and Prius. Unfortunately, it was the right decision for them monetarily.
 
Back
Top