Even before testing began, I had a feeling Stoner was going to repeat. And everything I've seen thus far tells me that he will. I think Stoner is going to win 11 races (and podiums in all the rest), Lorenzo 4, Pedrosa 2, and Spies 1. People are saying the 1000s would help level the playing field for guys like Spies and (before he died) Simoncelli, and while the power may negate the weight advantage that the little guys have, I think the talent of Stoner is above the rest of them at this point. I think it could still be a fairly close championship because when Jorge doesn't win I think he'll do no worse than 4th. But the championship is going to be decided before the last race, and probably after Phillip Island again.
This won't be popular, but I'd really like to see control engines a la Moto2 in GP. That above anything else would level the playing field. Look at the great racing we've had for the last 2 years in Moto2. In many ways I've been more amped for Moto2 than MotoGP because I know the racing is going to be more exciting. GP is close for about 4 laps, and then it usually becomes a parade. But most times in Moto2 it's been a race right to the end, or at least much closer to the end. The GP bikes are marvels of engineering, but obviously some are better than others, both in engine and chassis. Take away one variable, and you'd get closer racing, and it would more come down to who's the better racer than who has the better bike. We all know Rossi is one of the best ever, but with him on a clearly inferior bike he can't do shit. So go to control engines and you'll see who the better riders are. Sure, Ducati could screw up the chassis anyway - that's the part that's holding them back right now - but at least with control engines you wouldn't have Honda having the clear best bike both in terms of handling AND power.