cleverusername
New member
- Joined
- Mar 20, 2011
- Location
- Half Moon Bay
- Moto(s)
- 990 Adv. prev: tiger 1050, R1200GSA, vstrom, 690 SMC, FJR1300, FZ1, RC51, SV650
- Name
- kennef
Early reviews suggest the bike is neutered by electronics, and no "race" mode to silence the nanny.
http://www.visordown.com/road-tests-first-rides/first-ride-ktm-1290-super-duke-r-review/23805.html
Others less critical:
http://www.cycleworld.com/2013/10/20/2014-ktm-1290-super-duke-r-first-ride-review-photos/
this part gives me hope. i was starting to have flashbacks to my 2nd gen fz1 until i read this part:
"Part of me thinks 'I'll be the judge what's enough and what's too much, thank you very much' but at the same time, I can forgive the fact that throttle inputs are diluted because that’s easy to get your head around and makes for an easier bike to ride. A jerky or snatchy throttle is almost impossible to work with and at best a pain in the arse, at worse, downright dangerous. I'll take control over outright power, every day of the week."
the snatchy throttle on the fz1 completely ruined what was otherwise a perfect bike for me. the power delivery was similar too - not much going on most of the time until you were in the "highly committed" range of throttle opening.
but on the flip side, i think one reason people like twins (or dont) is how much more responsive they are at lower throttle openings. like in certain corners, some people prefer short shifiting and some will choose to ride the motor in the top 2k rpm. it sounds like with the way this throttle is programmed, this could appeal to those who perhaps don't like the way v-twins deliver lots of power during mid range rpm throttle adjustments.
blast to IRL meet you and
together.
.