Baptistro
Bapmarker
- Joined
- Apr 30, 2002
- Location
- SFO, Oaktown, Pinole
- Moto(s)
- 01 G1K, 02 BERG FE400E, 07 DRZ125L
- Name
- John 219
- BARF perks
- 2006 /2007 Barfie Winner
Taken this weekend:
I'm always trying to reverse engineer pictures.
Does anyone want to take a crack at guessing the lens (aperture, focal length) of this photo?
![]()
Mail Tribune Photo / Jamie Lusch
I am guessing 70mm f2.8? Maybe 50mm? It's hard to tell because it also looks like it was cropped in post.
Looks like about 70-75mm equivalent, which could have also been a 50 on a crop sensor body. I'm going to say stopped down more like f/4-f/5.6, the DoF looks deeper than 2.8 IMO.

Same thing happens to me. I believe when you load it into Lightroom, it takes the raw file and converts it to a basic picture. The sample you see for the first few seconds is I believe how the camera took the picture with your settings (ie your saturation settings), while Lightroom turns the picture to it's 'raw' form. Just bump the saturation up a tad in lightroom and it should look normal again

That's cool, Dave. Is that the ceiling of a courthouse or something?
But that's dumb! Aggh! Why is it adding another step when one is not needed?
Is there a way to override this? I can't imagine having to do this to 3,000 some images if you're a pro.
But that's dumb! Aggh! Why is it adding another step when one is not needed?
Is there a way to override this? I can't imagine having to do this to 3,000 some images if you're a pro.