I took the time to pay attention to girl bikes, I'm not sure I buy into it. Just not really sold on the tiny variances, couple that with little support and it's clear the industry views women as an afterthought.
Roxy likes the Intense 5.5 (my race bike) better than her old Turner, both small. (Lisa is free to try it) The nod went to a SC Nomad for AM though.
I'm hoping we can make some minor changes / adjustments to make Lisa's Blur feel more like the Trek she tested. Two things she really liked:
1. The shorter top tube. 20.7 inches on the small WSD Trek, 21.8 inches on the small Blur. Lisa's back usually bothers her on longer rides, but she had no issues after 15 miles on the Trek. We're going to try to go to a shorter stem to compensate.
2. Narrower handlebars with a higher rise. We're going to try to find a similar set.
The WSD Trek also had smaller diameter grips, shorter crank arms, and brakes levers that required a shorter reach, but she didn't really notice it. Those items are nothing we can't fit to the Blur. The end result on the Trek was increased confidence descending, with far less discomfort during extended pedaling. Granted, the Trek is an XC Trail bike with more relaxed angles and increased travel while the Blur is an XC Race bike with steeper angles.
After a season of racing I'm feeling more comfortable on small frames, I think my requirements keep changing.
It took me a while to figure out what I was comfortable with myself.
I've found that I like my AM / DH bikes to be on the small end of acceptable, making them more maneuverable while also allowing me to move around on the bike a little more to make it handle the way I want. Short top tube. High bars. Rider positioned with lots of weight on the rear wheel. My small Cannondale seems just right for that.
My XC bike needs to be just right for optimum pedaling power and minimal fatigue / discomfort. My medium Specialized seems just right for that.