Acknowledging statistics on divorce isn't the same as drawing up a contract ahead of time to handle it. Not faulting people who do, I just agree with Jason. Seem a bit paradoxical entering into an agreement based on trust with a contract predicated on mistrust. I see marriage as a commitment and entering into it with an "easy out" erodes that comiitment
stats matter to me. stats drive many of my decisions.
if i am worth $100 million dollars before marriage, i will ask her to sign a contract saying if we divorce, she's not going to take $50 million.
yes, it's calculating. it's not romantic. it's also reality.
if you want to ignore that risk (where half the marriages fail), be my guest.
if you are fine with flipping a coin (remember: 50/50 odds) and having half your hard earned wealth, accumulated over many years disappear (and if you win you just keep what you have), i have no problems with that. from a numbers perspective, it's a suckers bet when one partner has substantial assets and the other does not (best outcome is you maintain your wealth, worst outcome is you lose half. odds are 50/50).
everyone goes into marriage thinking it's forever so the strength of your convictions isn't a good gauge of the success of your marriage.
i understand everyone wants to focus only on the positive, especially something as emotional as marriage, but i have no problem with having insurance in case something goes wrong - which does happen half the time.
the prenup is an agreement that a divorce will be handled fairly. there is absolutely nothing wrong in saying "i want to marry you, but i can't predict the future and if things go bad for whatever reason, here's how we should split our assets." (maybe you agree 50/50 is fair).
marriage is about love. divorce is about business. makes sense to me (but obviously not to others) to handle the business side of things before agreeing to the business contract that implicitly comes with marriage.