Jalopyshoppe
idiot
- Joined
- Jun 13, 2012
- Location
- DIFFERENT PLACES
- Moto(s)
- FXR thing, Buell Ulysses, Honda CRF250 Rally, Hawk GT's , and various others.
- Name
- Fish
The problem with taking cars is that it creates profit for the private sector. Licenses get suspended, but fine payments are still required. I realize DUI creates emotional reactions, but suspending licenses just takes peoples ability to insure themselves away. Adding impound fees and other predatory private sector penalties is bullshit. You're getting into civil forfeiture territory. No one but lawyers should profit from criminal penalties or prosecution.
I don't have a solution to the DUI problem, but not driving is in many cases a ticket straight to poverty. (For the "who cares" crowd, shut up unless you've never sped or violated any traffic law ever.) Some people get caught more than others. Poor decisions do have consequences, but this system creates deeper holes and more profit to sleazy tow yards. Why would we just double down on it?
I don't have a solution to the DUI problem, but not driving is in many cases a ticket straight to poverty. (For the "who cares" crowd, shut up unless you've never sped or violated any traffic law ever.) Some people get caught more than others. Poor decisions do have consequences, but this system creates deeper holes and more profit to sleazy tow yards. Why would we just double down on it?


I'm sure the reactionary will miss your fine, very valid points.