EbolaMonkey said:
I think part of the reason is that i'm 6'2, 190ish with a 35" inseam.
With your size I could see how the R6 would be misery. I haven't heard anything bad about the Uly, actually only good things (at least with my short memory). But I would consider a lot more options then just the two bikes. Both bikes are expensive options regardless. I know that when I have the money one of the first bikes I am going to look at is the V-Strom 650 folowed by a Bandit 1250 and FZ1.
The GS would probably be my first choice if I could find one cheap enough.
sinncere said:
An air-cooled, two-valved single cylinder engine turning out mid-30's hp
he already complained about the wind blast. Not to mention that he had to haul it back home on the back of a truck because apparently he's losing oil somewhere (probably getting burned up).
Try 25 HP, I know, I put my wife's on a dyno
And tell him to get used to the wind and the burning oil. Stop for gas, add oil, stop for gas, add oil. The Blast burns an insane amount of oil, worse then my Nighthawk with a leaking valve guide seal. Not a huge deal, just carry oil when he rides.
nweaver said:
[1] I don't care what the red line is. Any engine that really only works for 1/2 the revv range, be it the 3k to 6k on a Buell or the 8k to 16k of an R6, is a peaky engine as it has a narrow powerband. Contrast with say a VFR which will work from 3k/4k to 10k+, or a WeeStrom which can work from 2.5k to 10k.
People choose to ignore that. The torque band on my 1000RR was huge, and had more peak torque, but the Buell junkies would still try to tell me I had a boring peaky inline 4 engine with no torque.
Bronto said:
Think Buell Ulysses is perfect design for a Dual Sport. Low center of gravity has gotta pay off, riding off road. Near Sportbike suspension for on the street.
A dual sport is good for both sports, not just one. The Uly may be able to go in the dirt, but not really play there. From all the reports I have read, no one has taken an Uly where I wouldn't have taken my 1000RR (and yes, I did hit some rough stuff).
A KLR is a dual sport, the V-Strom and Uly are not.
EbolaMonkey said:
Yeah i really worry about buell durability. Maybe not the best choice for the time being and wait a little while to see their durability.
The current Buell XB line has been out as long as the Honda CBR954RR. Honda has completely replaces the 954 with the 1000RR, and completely changed that since then. If Buell can't get a bike right after 5+ years, then they never will. So you can judge them now without waiting.
tzrider said:
I can't remember which moto-rag I'm quoting, but I loved this description of the K1200R's looks: "It looks like someone rode a magnet through a junkyard."
God that bike is hideous. Now the S, that is a different story.
antibling said:
i'm surprised sidewalk hasn't piped up yet
Sorry I am late. I was going to stay out of it, but then I kept reading more posts, and well I couldn't resist.
I think I got the better end of the deal still with the KTM
Chains Required said:
Buy the Buell - unless you are thin skinned and care what others assume.
2003 xbr with 12K and other then maintenance I have had to replace the drive belt and front wheel bearings.
I had double that mileage+ (over 26,000 miles in two years) on my 1000RR and all I did was change the oil every 5000 or so miles. Replacing wheel bearings every year would get old. At least my 1984 Nighthawk is more reliable so far.