I blame our poor education system and TV culture. They encourage people to not think of other viewpoints as valid. Instead of rationally evaluating risk for themselves they jump to insulting others who hold alternative values or beliefs.
In short, the many insulting and venomous post in this thread reek of intolerance. Some people think gear is the answer to safely riding a motorcycle. I believe good judgment and mindfulness are the critical elements to safe riding.
I wear the gear I consider appropriate for the ride and potential accidents. So far I've had a quarter million miles of riding without "needing" any of my gear. Its helped keep me warm or cool, its helped me to be more noticeable on the road, and its protected me from bug and rock strikes. I'll keep wearing the best gear I can and encourage others to do the same. However, I'm not going to insult them for making different choices.


You don't get it. Snip You are not in control. Sorry.

You don't get it. You are not in control. I am sure you believe as long as you ride well and safely, you won't crash. That doesn't apply to the guy who suddenly and without warning turns left in front of you, or drifts across the yellow line in a blind corner and uses you for a hood ornament. You are not in control. Sorry.
I blame our poor education system and TV culture. They encourage people to not think of other viewpoints as valid. Instead of rationally evaluating risk for themselves they jump to insulting others who hold alternative values or beliefs.
In short, the many insulting and venomous post in this thread reek of intolerance. Some people think gear is the answer to safely riding a motorcycle. I believe good judgment and mindfulness are the critical elements to safe riding.
I wear the gear I consider appropriate for the ride and potential accidents. So far I've had a quarter million miles of riding without "needing" any of my gear. Its helped keep me warm or cool, its helped me to be more noticeable on the road, and its protected me from bug and rock strikes. I'll keep wearing the best gear I can and encourage others to do the same. However, I'm not going to insult them for making different choices.
You might be in for a rude awakening.

No, YOU don't get it. I know that I can only control my own actions. That is enough for me. I don't feel the need to control others.![]()

35-40 crashes? I have crashed once, in 1979, on the street. About 400,000 street miles. Many times off road, but those don't count. I couldn't afford to fix my bike that many times Ernie.
Six on the street the rest on the track. I crashed a lot in my younger years. The crash two weeks ago was the first since the guy on the GSXR took me out at Thill in T9 five years ago.
So, for intellectual conversations sake, I propose the following question.
Why does everyone get so upset at people who don't wear gear?
I propose that wearing gear does NOTHING in the means of crash prevention. This would equate to the rider who crashes as only causing additional injury to himself, but still not having an affect on anyone else. It's his skin that pays the price, not mine. Gear serves only the purpose of injury prevention, but does not make someone less likely to crash.
I'm not wanting everyone to agree with me, but I can't be the only one out there that understands this. Or am I mistaken? Feel free to educate me if I have overlooked something. Either way, I wear gear sometimes, and ALWAYS ride within my limits as to prevent an accident.
Yes, I am sure your Jedi mind control is capable of stopping someone from making an illegal u turn that you don't see. .
You have failed to get my point, its the same one LouMC tries to make often enough. I mitigate risks to the best of my ability, but still may die at any time. I'm ok with that.
I can't even count the number of left turners, lane incursions, deer, objects, and various hazards that I've avoided over the years. so far gear has not been what saved me.
I still wear full gear, because I believe in doing dangerous things safely. Why does that incite you to make stupid analogies? What part of me being ATGATT makes you think I'm delusional?
You have failed to get my point, its the same one LouMC tries to make often enough. I mitigate risks to the best of my ability, but still may die at any time. I'm ok with that.
I can't even count the number of left turners, lane incursions, deer, objects, and various hazards that I've avoided over the years. so far gear has not been what saved me.
I still wear full gear, because I believe in doing dangerous things safely. Why does that incite you to make stupid analogies? What part of me being ATGATT makes you think I'm delusional?