How does WSBK restrict the bikes? Ducati states prety clearly that the reason they are dropping out is because the bike development in WSBK has gotten completely out of control to the point of being prototype racing.


But in this environment, it will have to restrict investment, as there aren't the sponsor or mfr dollars to pay for it. The series has no choice, particularly with MotoGP going back to 1000s and allowing the CRT teams in. Superbike will become less relevant and more stock like. Then maybe Ducati returns.
Get out know. Spend the money on technical development that translates right into the showroom. Wait for Superbike to return to stock like bikes and then dominate again. As others have said, with the advertising that Rossi will provide, there is little to no incremental benefit to the advertising WSB will offer. Sounds like a pretty shrewd move to me.
I do think Rossi's arrival has something to do with it. IIRC, the 2008 or 2009 Ducati WSBK budget was $10 million USD, that is $5 million dollars LESS than Rossi salary requirements. I know Marlboro covers a big chunk of the Ducati MotoGP expense, but I don't think anyone really knows (the general public) if they actually cover 100% of their racing expenses; everything from team managers, mechanics, travel, etc..
Aprilia, Fuck Yeah. Run home to your mom Ducati.
They're developing a 1198 replacement, the 1198 isn't winning in WSBK, and they're footing the bill for Rossi. All very good reasons to have your factory WSBK team focusing on developing the new superbike chassis off the grid, not the old one on the grid. Selfish but rational.
Their fans will forgive them when they show up with an 1199 in a monocoque chassis for the 2012 season.
:/ but they (ducati & haga) were doing damn well in the wsbk?
but... that's from my knowledge from the2009 wsbk. is the 2010 season over?
Italians "pulling-out"? isn't that against their religion or something?
That's right, there is no evidence to support that conclusion. Even if it is correct, a business would never let that get out, as its too damaging to their image...signing someone to big bucks and not being able to pay for it.
But, as I mentioned, there are a lot more ancillary costs to signing Rossi than just his salary, none of us will ever know the true cost and who pays for what. I don't even think some of the factories know how much their MotoGP programs actually cost.
I would not be surprised if the Rossi effect contributed to their WSBK demise, and I would also not be surprised if Ducati management is using this to their advantage by pulling out, getting the rules changed (again) and coming back in. I think the biggest problem for Ducati has not been their machinery, but the fact that Tardozzi is no longer there. Yes, the factory team has not been competitive, but the Duc with Checa has been competitive and would be more in the game if it weren't for the problems in Utah.
None of us will truly know the reasons, as what Ducati says in press releases to what is actually said in the board room are 2 different things.
I also wouldn't be surprised if you see Rossi on a Ducati SBK at a few select rounds, whether it be 2011 or 2012.
1198 succesor: L2 or V4?
Italians "pulling-out"? isn't that against their religion or something?
I very seriously doubt that Ducati will be cutting expenses anywhere but rather will be putting the money into R&D rather than trucking the Corse all over the globe. On top of that, the additional amount that Rossi is going to cost Ducati isn't anywhere near the cost to run the WSBK team.