• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Most dangerous dam

Status
Not open for further replies.
stop the presses
 
Good point. Maybe I shouldn't have used the word "offensive." Behaving in a respectful manner IS part of the rules, but it is enforced in a way where the term "respectful" is defined as not EXPLICITLY insulting or threatening someone. Trolls are good at carefully wording their statements of hate, insult, and harassment while staying within TOS as they are enforced.

Just watch: asdfghwy will be the only one suspended. And if anyone else gets suspended, I bet it won't be MMarklin. You know, because he was being respectful when he sarcastically wished death on a population bigger than that of North and South Dakota.

TOS are basically just protecting trolls at this point, and the conversation I used to find so enlightening here is pretty much gone.

EDIT: If offending people isn't implicitly part of TOS, why the dickbutt censorship?

Going back to reading post 2, Mcmarklin only said something offensive if you assume he was being sarcastic. When he was queried about it and asked if he thought it isn't horrific, he said, "Of course not. It would be horrible. I said as much. Please re-read my post."

Is everybody getting spun up under a false assumption? Seems like a distinct possibility. I don't think what Mcmarklin said deserves suspension even if offending people was against TOS.
 
Going back to reading post 2, Mcmarklin only said something offensive if you assume he was being sarcastic. When he was queried about it and asked if he thought it isn't horrific, he said, "Of course not. It would be horrible. I said as much. Please re-read my post."

Is everybody getting spun up under a false assumption? Seems like a distinct possibility. I don't think what Mcmarklin said deserves suspension even if offending people was against TOS.

Keep polishing that turd buddy
 
Going back to reading post 2, Mcmarklin only said something offensive if you assume he was being sarcastic. When he was queried about it and asked if he thought it isn't horrific, he said, "Of course not. It would be horrible. I said as much. Please re-read my post."

Is everybody getting spun up under a false assumption? Seems like a distinct possibility. I don't think what Mcmarklin said deserves suspension even if offending people was against TOS.

Way to (attempt to) spin it.

Intent is blatant in his post.
 
Going back to reading post 2, Mcmarklin only said something offensive if you assume he was being sarcastic. When he was queried about it and asked if he thought it isn't horrific, he said, "Of course not. It would be horrible. I said as much. Please re-read my post."

Is everybody getting spun up under a false assumption? Seems like a distinct possibility. I don't think what Mcmarklin said deserves suspension even if offending people was against TOS.

Christ, just stop
 
Going back to reading post 2, Mcmarklin only said something offensive if you assume he was being sarcastic. When he was queried about it and asked if he thought it isn't horrific, he said, "Of course not. It would be horrible. I said as much. Please re-read my post."

Is everybody getting spun up under a false assumption? Seems like a distinct possibility. I don't think what Mcmarklin said deserves suspension even if offending people was against TOS.


225ui.jpg
 
Going back to reading post 2, Mcmarklin only said something offensive if you assume he was being sarcastic. When he was queried about it and asked if he thought it isn't horrific, he said, "Of course not. It would be horrible. I said as much. Please re-read my post."

Is everybody getting spun up under a false assumption? Seems like a distinct possibility. I don't think what Mcmarklin said deserves suspension even if offending people was against TOS.

You guys gotta stick together right?
 
It may well have been a sarcastic comment. I'm not trying to spin anything. Just pointing out what was actually said, vs the way it was interpreted. Ever have somebody get upset over an email or text over something that was misinterpreted due to not being able to convey tone?
 
It may well have been a sarcastic comment. I'm not trying to spin anything. Just pointing out what was actually said, vs the way it was interpreted. Ever have somebody get upset over an email or text over something that was misinterpreted due to not being able to convey tone?

Go back to his post, highlight the emoticon he started with, and paste it into a text editor. It's "cool."

Zero misinterpretation here.
 
It may well have been a sarcastic comment. I'm not trying to spin anything. Just pointing out what was actually said, vs the way it was interpreted. Ever have somebody get upset over an email or text over something that was misinterpreted due to not being able to convey tone?

Kinda like the John Kerry quote thread you posted



But back on topic, this will be a massive disaster if the dam fails. The consequences are unlikely to be limited to Iraq. So whatever your opinions of the people who live there, you should be concerned.
 
Last edited:
Thread closed. By unanimous mod vote mmarklin is suspended for 4.1a.
Whether a bigoted remark or a foul joke, if it causes divisiveness it will be subject to the above TOS amendment.

Everyone can decide what it was on their own as it should be.
 
asdfghwy has been suspended for violation of TOS 4.1, also by unanimous moderator vote.
 
Thread reopened, please keep it chill and on point.
 
So the same thing could happen to the San Luis Dam. Earthen Dam. Except 200,000 Mercedians.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top