sidewazzz
Active member
Case in point.
That's really what you come back with? You've left me scarred with embarrassment.
You're still avoiding the question CLOWN
Case in point.
That's really what you come back with? You've left me scarred with embarrassment.
You're still avoiding the question CLOWN
It doesn't get old.
![]()
poor guy... He looks like someone just ran over his career with a Diavel.
Poor guy... he looks like someone just ran over his puppy with a pit bike.
http://www.cycleworld.com/2013/02/12/attack-performance-motogp-crt-update-dyno-run/
Richard Stanboli secures his place in the top ten greatest living Americans of the World!


I don't feel bad for him at all. he cried so much about being deserving of a factory ride. Well now you got it, buddy! enjoy!!

Haysoos-Chreesto!! God that sounded pretty incredible. By far the best sounding privateer engine I have heard to date. Did you guys notice how long it took to reach max RPM when he grabbed that handful of throttle there? I'm guessing 17,500 RPM at the top? I sure wish these guys well; I would love to see them surprise some people.
the article says 14,500-15,000. Can you go past 15,000 with conventional springs?
http://www.cycleworld.com/2013/02/12/attack-performance-motogp-crt-update-dyno-run/
Richard Stanboli secures his place in the top ten greatest living Americans of the World!
![]()

Mat Oxley
At last year’s first Sepang tests the best CRT bike was 3.2 seconds down, eight months later at the Sepang GP the gap was 2.9 seconds and at Sepang last week it had shrunk to 2.5. Now, if you put Pedrosa or Lorenzo on Aleix Espargaro’s Aprilia ART perhaps the gap would shrink another half a second or so. In other words, there’s not a huge difference between the best protos and the best CRTs – let’s say about 1.7 per cent. That’s not a lot when a full-factory RCV costs – at a wild guess – five times more than an ART powered by a streetbike engine.
A short but significant read on CRT's, not necessarily in defense of, but just the reality of where they are now and likely heading to:
That is one way to look at things. And it puts CRTs less than a minute behind by the end without getting lapped on most tracks. Well, that is something. No different than some other racing, I suppose.Mat Oxley
At last year’s first Sepang tests the best CRT bike was 3.2 seconds down, eight months later at the Sepang GP the gap was 2.9 seconds and at Sepang last week it had shrunk to 2.5. Now, if you put Pedrosa or Lorenzo on Aleix Espargaro’s Aprilia ART perhaps the gap would shrink another half a second or so. In other words, there’s not a huge difference between the best protos and the best CRTs – let’s say about 1.7 per cent. That’s not a lot when a full-factory RCV costs – at a wild guess – five times more than an ART powered by a streetbike engine.

That is one way to look at things. And it puts CRTs less than a minute behind by the end without getting lapped on most tracks. Well, that is something. No different than some other racing, I suppose.

