• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Buy Gpro now!

I might be in the similar boat with Fitbit although i believe they will post a very strong Q4 (holiday season). This is just because i will need the $$ for next spring. I think longterm they have a way better shot at pulling through than gopro.
 
I followed a coworker into it and didn't do my due diligence - whoops, won't be telling the wife about it :laughing

It was a gamble that didn't pay off but I can use the loss against gains to reduce the sting a little.
Before I put any more money in this market I'm waiting to see what the interest rate effect will be.
 
It was a gamble that didn't pay off but I can use the loss against gains to reduce the sting a little.
Before I put any more money in this market I'm waiting to see what the interest rate effect will be.

Feds interest rate coyness has been priced in. thats why everything has been flat. market is a 6 month forward indicator.
too slow, sonny..just give me your money for hookers and pizza..:nchantr
 
i didn't even know gopro HAD a media piece or that one was hyped, wtf are they trying to develop?

I'm not completely clear what direction they're trying to take, but I could imagine something like Redbull is doing. They're just a beverage company that markets to the extreme sports segment. They don't even make video cameras, what the hell are they doing sponsoring athletes, putting on events and trying to make RedbullTV?

They way I see it, they are leveraging their brand to further associate the name Redbull with extreme sports, and that's something I could see GoPro doing as well. Keep in mind, GoPro productions don't necessarily have to use only GoPros.
 
Do you mind expanding on why you think that is?

Sure. Success in internet video media at this point is all about two things: scale, and audience. You need lots of eyeballs, advertisers need to know what kind of eyeballs they are, and ideally they are good eyeballs (US, millennials or female soccer moms, etc.) Youtube has all of these things, and even it isn't wildly profitable yet, because it also needs to deploy and maintain global caching infrastructure and that is extremely expensive, and a lot of video dollars still head to plain old linear TV because of ad agency buying patterns and industry inertia.

GPRO is a boutique video content provider and it does not have scale. It won't attract the big advertiser $$s because the audience isn't large enough to be worth the media buy. Without sustained big advertiser commitment, third party content producers will still publish their content to YT and other sites. Without exclusive content that is in-demand from hundreds of millions of people, there is not enough revenue to move the needle for GPRO.

Money requires size, size requires money. That's why GPRO won't make it, in internet media.
 
They way I see it, they are leveraging their brand to further associate the name Redbull with extreme sports, and that's something I could see GoPro doing as well. Keep in mind, GoPro productions don't necessarily have to use only GoPros.

That makes GPRO a buyer of media, not a seller. Which they have done, quite successfully, to create a successful brand.
 
Sure. Success in internet video media at this point is all about two things: scale, and audience. You need lots of eyeballs, advertisers need to know what kind of eyeballs they are, and ideally they are good eyeballs (US, millennials or female soccer moms, etc.) Youtube has all of these things, and even it isn't wildly profitable yet, because it also needs to deploy and maintain global caching infrastructure and that is extremely expensive, and a lot of video dollars still head to plain old linear TV because of ad agency buying patterns and industry inertia.

GPRO is a boutique video content provider and it does not have scale. It won't attract the big advertiser $$s because the audience isn't large enough to be worth the media buy. Without sustained big advertiser commitment, third party content producers will still publish their content to YT and other sites. Without exclusive content that is in-demand from hundreds of millions of people, there is not enough revenue to move the needle for GPRO.

Money requires size, size requires money. That's why GPRO won't make it, in internet media.

I see. You're imagining a standalone site where people will go to for content. So like a motorcycle.com or something similar where people will go to gopro.com to view content.

Isn't it possible that they take on more of a production role and produce media for consumption in other ways? What if they partnered with Netflix in producing an extreme sports documentary or series?

That makes GPRO a buyer of media, not a seller. Which they have done, quite successfully, to create a successful brand.

Right, they've definitely created a successful brand. Now that they have firmly associated themselves with extreme sports, isn't it possible for them to leverage that branding to sell media? IE: GoPro = sports, therefore GoPro content = sports content. If I want sports content, I'll seek out GPRO content.

Something like that, akin to how ESPN is synonymous with sports. (I mean, duh, but I think you catch my drift)
 
compare NFL production budgets with xtreme sports production budgets. as you say..duh.

on a lighter note, xtreme sports, gopros' market, can not go mainstream, ever. then it would not be xtreme. again..duh.

maybe a $90 kidz gopro, sold at toys r us, target demo of 9-14 yo would do it.

still a one trick pony.
 
I followed a coworker into it and didn't do my due diligence - whoops, won't be telling the wife about it :laughing

Up 50% today. Obviously now that fri should have been the day to take a gamble on this one. Fuck NBG with a bag of dicks.
 
Just today it was as low at 0.17 and as high as 0.33. If you timed it right the potential existed to double you money. Bet this bitch doubles again from here, but not touching it :thumbdown
 
Palo Alto Networks earning came out. Stock jumped almost nine points in early trading.

Palo Alto Networks reported adjusted loss per share on a proportionate tax basis, of 36 cents. The figure was significantly greater than the Consensus Estimate of a loss of 16 cents. The company suffered a loss of 26 cents in the year-ago quarter.

In fact they've only ever reported a profit in 1 quarter in the last 3-4 years. They have never even posted close to consensus.

people are buying on the thought of an acquisition?
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    40.1 KB · Views: 22
Last edited:
Palo Alto Networks reported adjusted loss per share on a proportionate tax basis, of 36 cents. The figure was significantly greater than the Consensus Estimate of a loss of 16 cents. The company suffered a loss of 26 cents in the year-ago quarter.

In fact they've only ever reported a profit in 1 quarter in the last 3-4 years. They have never even posted close to consensus.

people are buying on the thought of an acquisition?

Why not link the entire report instead of the graph? The entire report is more telling.

http://www.zacks.com/stock/news/166360/palo-alto-networks-panw-q2-loss-widens-revenues-beat
 
graph say volatility is smoothing out, and earnings are beginning to rise.
 
Might as well pull the 10Q in as well

Before employee stock, PANW posted a positive gain on profits
After they posted a loss

It appears Senior Employees are gutting the company from within - which alludes to a buyout


If so, wouldn't that make this a good time to buy, then?
I would personally like to see 135 to 140 before getting serious about buying. it's too spendy.
 
Last edited:
Might as well pull the 10Q in as well

Before employee stock, PANW posted a positive gain on profits
After they posted a loss

It appears Senior Employees are gutting the company from within - which alludes to a buyout

I'm curious where you are getting your info. Where are you seeing that C lvl employees are gutting the company from within?

Palo Alto Networks just broke ground on a new 1 million sqft space, are the leaders in the industry and are out performing everyone else in a market that a lot of folks no nothing about. I see a lot of seeing if anything. When the stock rises so quickly and everyone is vesting there is a mass sell off.

This graph doesn't show much but it can give you an idea.
http://www.nasdaq.com/symbol/panw/ownership-summary

I'm no genius when it comes to picking stock but imo the stock is going to rise again to +200. At the same time getting in at this price is to rich for my blood. I would rather diversify with the amount of money I would have to pony up for PANW stock at its current value.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top