• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Comic strips,and Troll Faces, etc. (NSFW images must be linked & labelled)

quicksparks said:
The written coachings to Robert aside, what makes the Muhammed toons political if the other religious toons aren't? They all can be found funny or offensive, can't they? Seems like a double standard to me.
Click to expand...

Well one linked Mohamed with suicide bombings, Another made a joke about Jesus having holes in hands from crucifixion.

The original post by Revnot was a joke about circumcision which is not Christian only thing, Robert followed up with some comic referencing French terrorist attack a while back.
 
Last edited:
UDRider said:
Well one linked Mohamed with suicide bombings,...
Click to expand...

'Mohamed' and suicide bombings are not linked, they are a factual part of radical islam. We see it weekly in real life.

I too agree that there seems to be a double standard.
Posting up dead/resurrected Jesus not being able to look away from masturbating people is NOT offensive?
 
Last edited:
Some people at work reminded of Wally here...
 

Attachments

  • 171214_DilbertConcept.jpg
    171214_DilbertConcept.jpg
    50.7 KB · Views: 189
Jesus image wasn't political just really bad taste.
I saw it on the Dysfunctional Veterans page and literally laughed out loud.
 
Lonster said:
'Mohamed' and suicide bombings are not linked, they are a factual part of radical islam. We see it weekly in real life.

I too agree that there seems to be a double standard.
Posting up dead/resurrected Jesus not being able to look away from masturbating people is NOT offensive?
Click to expand...

It's an interpretation of radical Islamist, and here we are having a political discussion.
Jesus pic is in poor taste, but it's not political.
 
Well maybe political was not quite a right word. Would people be OK with this type of images and is this type of stuff we want in this thread?
Personally I think no.
NSFW o guess
 
Last edited:
UDRider said:
Done. Although didn't think it rose to the level of NSFW more then some muhhamed pics that were posted. :dunno
Click to expand...

You don't need to stoop to that level.

Besides, your pic is explicitly against TOS. Whether Robert's pics are against TOS has apparently been addressed, and it looks like it's been flagged as disruptive, but not a violation.
 
CoorsLight said:
You don't need to stoop to that level.
Click to expand...
I was trying to demonstrate a point, but yes.

Besides, your pic is explicitly against TOS. Whether Robert's pics are against TOS has apparently been addressed, and it looks like it's been flagged as disruptive, but not a violation.
Click to expand...

Lets take his pic of muhammed with little girl and a bed. Both mine and his imply a sexual act that is about to happen, or has happened, and both use a religious figure and both do not show an act it self. So I am curious which part of TOS my pic violates that his doesn't. So as not to cross it again.
 
UDRider said:
I was trying to demonstrate a point, but yes.



Lets take his pic of muhammed with little girl and a bed. Both mine and his imply a sexual act that is about to happen, or has happened, and both use a religious figure and both do not show an act it self. So I am curious which part of TOS my pic violates that his doesn't. So as not to cross it again.
Click to expand...

I'm no mod, so I can't say, but I can say that your pic was pr0n and NSFW.

Play in the dirt, and get dirty.

Robert is easily triggered, and enjoys bigoted media. That's known. His posts are not going to be taken down, and he's shown that a respectful request to stop does not result in him acting respectful.

If you continue to stimulate his delicate sensitivity, then this shit's just going to go on forever, and you'll be the one who ends up getting bapped.
 
CoorsLight said:
I'm no mod, so I can't say, but I can say that your pic was pr0n and NSFW.

Play in the dirt, and get dirty.

Robert is easily triggered, and enjoys bigoted media. That's known. His posts are not going to be taken down, and he's shown that a respectful request to stop does not result in him acting respectful.

If you continue to stimulate his delicate sensitivity, then this shit's just going to go on forever, and you'll be the one who ends up getting bapped.
Click to expand...


I agree, most of the porn I watch on a regular basis has fully clothed women drinking milk. Wanna share porn?

Regarding the issue at hand, I don't really care. However the mentailty of the dude posting the mo stuff is a bit much. Saying "you're welcome" like he is doing BARF a huge favor by not being a jerk. Geee bud, thanks. You know, I didn't kill, rape, or bugger anyone today. YOU"RE WELCOME.

Jesus dude (don't take offense to the use of that term), get over yourself.
 
CoorsLight said:
You don't need to stoop to that level.

Besides, your pic is explicitly against TOS. Whether Robert's pics are against TOS has apparently been addressed, and it looks like it's been flagged as disruptive, but not a violation.
Click to expand...

How the hell is it a TOS violation? It is a woman in a Habit for fuck's sake. Short of a full hijab, it is no possible to be more covered up.

LOLPics---Forever-Stallone.jpg
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top