• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Digital SLR / DSLR Camera Question / DSLR Thread 2

Holy fucking shit.

It's about as noisy at 6400 ISO as the Rebel is at 400 ISO. Will post pics later when I've taken something a bit more interesting to look it.

Need new glass. The body is by far, no longer the limiting factor in sharpness methinks.

Goddamn this is a nice camera!
 
It's a dark and rainy day.

Not bad for a cheapie lens, dim room, and 6400 ISO. And I had to compress the sh*t out of it, and it's cropped.

But, still able to get away with F7.1 and 80th of a second!!!

This was a dark room. Did I mention that it was dark?

Fook me.

Will have to try some at ISO 50 now. Lemme try the flash.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0017 - Copy.JPG
    IMG_0017 - Copy.JPG
    183.7 KB · Views: 66
zypher said:
congrats on the new toy...
go to CFn. III: #2 set to 4 and #7 set to 1...
Click to expand...

Thanks :thumbup

Make focussing for people far more reliable.

And on that note, I shot pics at my party last night with CANDLELIGHT and 1 string of icicle Xmas-tree lights. That's it...

Was up to 50th of a second most of the time, at ISO 6400, noise is there, but acceptable and probably easily cleanable with NeatImage.

And the focussing was fine. Hunted a little bit occasionally, but in the same light, the Rebel basically never found focus, except on hightlights sometimes.

I was worried that I was swapping to 'more of the same' as far as low-light focus abilities, but it's an ENORMOUS improvement over the Rebel - just, hooge. I can see that there's room for improvement even more, but for me, it's fine. I don't expect to do many shoots by candlelight...
 
also 5dmk2 with 85 1.8 is a great portrait combo...tack sharp and you won't loose a limb when you get one...hahaha

taken with the ol trusty xti with the crappy ol kit lens...
 

Attachments

  • IMG_0002.jpg
    IMG_0002.jpg
    61.3 KB · Views: 64
  • IMG_0004.jpg
    IMG_0004.jpg
    62 KB · Views: 62
Last edited:
i got a couple of buddies that shoot with hass, film tho, but still great!..
i was close to getting a 500C hass before but thought about the film expenses and processing...
 
:laughing That would be sick. I think the H3D is down to $30k or so. :p

Still not super thrilled with the 35/1.8 lens. Seems to either miss focus by a touch, or it's just not all that sharp. Grumble. Getting some decent shots with it, though. And with a metal mount and water seal, I'm happy to take it out in the rain while picking a Christmas tree with the kids. Here's at F/2, unadjusted out of the camera.

Somebody tell me if this looks soft to you. 100% size of the focus area here: http://nickdavis.zenfolio.com/img/v5/p660845358.png

p681834836-5.jpg
 
Last edited:
zypher said:
also 5dmk2 with 85 1.8 is a great portrait combo...tack sharp and you won't lose a limb when you get one...hahaha
Click to expand...

85 prime on full frame :love

You should do it, Ian. Probably be the best $400 you'll ever spend on that camera.

BrassPremier said:
yea face doesnt seem to be in focus as much as the hair is
Click to expand...

That's what I thought too. Seems to be consistently back-focusing by a few inches. :rant
 
Last edited:
cycle61 said:
:laughing That would be sick. I think the H3D is down to $30k or so. :p

Still not super thrilled with the 35/1.8 lens. Seems to either miss focus by a touch, or it's just not all that sharp. Grumble. Getting some decent shots with it, though. And with a metal mount and water seal, I'm happy to take it out in the rain while picking a Christmas tree with the kids. Here's at F/2, unadjusted out of the camera.

Somebody tell me if this looks soft to you. 100% size of the focus area here: http://nickdavis.zenfolio.com/img/v5/p660845358.png

p681834836-5.jpg
Click to expand...

looks fine. if u feel the need, use the sharpening tool in ps..
 
on the full image i really dont notice it, so on a smaller print probably would be fine. a little sharpening in ps probably couldnt hurt
 
cycle61 said:
85 prime on full frame :love

You should do it, Ian. Probably be the best $400 you'll ever spend on that camera.



That's what I thought too. Seems to be consistently back-focusing by a few inches. :rant
Click to expand...

Yeah, very torn between getting a really decent prime, or saving up for the 24-70 L series...

I just dropped 200 on this just to have something OK for everyday.

I have a shoot coming up, but guessing I can use only the 50mm and my 70-300 no problems, as the full frame makes the 50 very flexible indeed in a studio, and suddenly the 70 becomes almost useable for full-figure pictures without having to be halfway down the drive :laughing
 
Joebar4000 said:
Yeah, very torn between getting a really decent prime, or saving up for the 24-70 L series...

I just dropped 200 on this just to have something OK for everyday.

I have a shoot coming up, but guessing I can use only the 50mm and my 70-300 no problems, as the full frame makes the 50 very flexible indeed in a studio, and suddenly the 70 becomes almost useable for full-figure pictures without having to be halfway down the drive :laughing
Click to expand...

can you still cancel the order? or you have it already? get the 85 and you'll be really happy with it...
 
Lol!

Problem is, I have no 'every day' lens for it at the moment at all, the 50 is OK, but not for indoors when you can't get far enough away.

I may flog the 70-300 and just try to get the L lens that much sooner. But for right now, I need something wider than the 50.

The 85 prime IS on my shopping list tho...
 
50 is good enough (for me) indoors...and hopefully soon to get a 35 and a 20 prime...along with the 135L prime...this hobby is expensive, but the most important thing is "it makes us happy" hahaha...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top