• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

Digital SLR / DSLR Camera Question / DSLR Thread 2

I would punch a roomful of nuns for a 24/1.4....:love

If I were a bazillionare, I'd have a Canon 5dMII just so I could use that lens.
 
Joebar4000 said:
Lightroom, Photoshop, NeatImage, PhotoMatix if you do HDR images.

Well, that's what I use. Lightroom is good for most stuff, and is a handy RAW preview tool, as Vista doesn't support thumbnails previews for RAW (this simply confirms Vista as the POS it really is).

If I could have a do-over, I'd have got a Mac for doing work stuff at home :|
Click to expand...

Photomatix is only good for HDR if you want your HDR images to look like everyone else's. The look is far too telltale for me. But them I'm of the mind that you shouldn't be able to tell that an HDR is and HDR. it should just look like an image with extraordinary dynamic range.

I do mine by hand in photoshop.

98% of my images only get the Lightroom treatment, some get hit with the NeatImage hammer if they need it. Very rarely do I need to go into photoshop.
 
TylerW said:
Photomatix is only good for HDR if you want your HDR images to look like everyone else's. The look is far too telltale for me. But them I'm of the mind that you shouldn't be able to tell that an HDR is and HDR. it should just look like an image with extraordinary dynamic range.

I do mine by hand in photoshop.

98% of my images only get the Lightroom treatment, some get hit with the NeatImage hammer if they need it. Very rarely do I need to go into photoshop.
Click to expand...

The default settings in Photomatix overdo it... as do most people - I can get nice results that fool most people. Not sure if you'll agree with the posted pic, but I can post the source images later :)

I'm hoping to be able to drop NeatImage when I upgrade the camera...
 

Attachments

  • 2009_08_03 Lick Obs HDR Source 3_FINAL - Copy.jpg
    2009_08_03 Lick Obs HDR Source 3_FINAL - Copy.jpg
    248 KB · Views: 77
Hmm... this is the top-end image.

When I do a comparo between the 3 images, looks pretty good to me?

The thing that leaps out at me is it appears to be a bit over-saturated.

This might not be the best example as even the originals look a bit 'HDR'ish.

But also bear in mind, this is my attempts at manually adjusting stuff with Photomatix, it may well still be 'overdone'.

Point being, I think the tool is fine, I think that for most users of Photomatix, it's what they do with it that's the issue.
 

Attachments

  • 2009_08_03 Lick Obs HDR Source 3_01 - Copy.jpg
    2009_08_03 Lick Obs HDR Source 3_01 - Copy.jpg
    76.2 KB · Views: 67
BrassPremier said:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dl...rRngCbx=1&_udlo=&_udhi=&_sop=12&_fvi=1&_rdc=1
Click to expand...

I saw that on BorrowLens's twitter a few hours ago. :laughing

Also, meet and test shoot with Amber and Crisieda just a few minutes ago at Borders'. Amber is a MUA, and Charlena wants to get into some modeling. Hopefully gonna be working with them a couple of times here. Can't upload any pics right now because I'm at Starbux with no USB cable. Looks good on the camera screen, I'll share later if they hold up fullsize. :thumbup

Also, I swear I'm gonna give in and get an iPhone one of these days. Just a few more articles like THIS. :)
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
nick, the face needs a lil pop...other than that they are good...and maybe
tone down the white on the BG...
 
Last edited:
Good suggestions, thanks. I'm not thrilled with how they came out. I should have stopped down to 2.8 or so, and been more careful with my focus points. She was happy with what she saw though, should have some more refined stuff with her over the next few weeks.
 
cycle61 said:
Good suggestions, thanks. I'm not thrilled with how they came out. I should have stopped down to 2.8 or so, and been more careful with my focus points. She was happy with what she saw though, should have some more refined stuff with her over the next few weeks.
Click to expand...



I like the high ISO capabilities of your camera. Mine is horribly grainy at anything over 400 ISO. Nikon definitely does high ISO better than Canon.
 
Canon Eos Rebel XT:

Is this a decent camera for $250. no lense?
 

Attachments

  • eos.jpg
    eos.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 98
  • rebel.jpg
    rebel.jpg
    7 KB · Views: 102
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top