Anyone riding one of the new Rock Shox Pikes? Thinking about grabbing a 130mm version for my Trek Fuel EX 29er. It currently has a 120mm Fox 32, which I think I'll toss on my Trek Superfly... I've been wanting that bike to be a bit more playful and stiffer in the front end. It currently has a 2011 100mm Fox 32 with a quick release.
Anyway, it he Pike as awesome as everyone says it is? I'd love to beef up the front end of the Fuel, and it seems like it'll do the trick. Thoughts?
Really nice and expensive.
You need a 15mm front wheel
I demo'd one on a Nomad. So much better than my 2013 Fox 32 it's not even funny. Way stiffer, no midstroke dive, and no wallowing. That said, I went with an Xfusion. 95% of the improvement at half the cost.
Call Biker Bob if you go for the Pike.
Well, I haven't ridden one personally and I don't want to be a downer, but one of my riding buddies put one on his 29er, replacing a Fox 34. I just happened to ask him about a week or so ago and he mentioned that the damping is better, but it is not as stiff. And he's very particular about stiffness.
BTW, I believe his is 140 or 150mm travel, so that may make a difference. But he mentioned he thought the weakness was in the crown area, although I'm not sure how he could tell that. Anyway, just another viewpoint. If you get one, post a review.
Well, I haven't ridden one personally and I don't want to be a downer, but one of my riding buddies put one on his 29er, replacing a Fox 34. I just happened to ask him about a week or so ago and he mentioned that the damping is better, but it is not as stiff. And he's very particular about stiffness.
BTW, I believe his is 140 or 150mm travel, so that may make a difference. But he mentioned he thought the weakness was in the crown area, although I'm not sure how he could tell that. Anyway, just another viewpoint. If you get one, post a review.
I'm impressed, especially after considering moving to Fox, but then I got an expert opinion. That sold me, but at $700 it was not what I consider a good deal.
Because mountain biking is loaded with good deals
For real. I'm amazed at how much I spend even getting shit at cost. Makes me wonder who actually buys this stuff at full retail. If I didn't get cost, I'd probably ride full SLX.
I have a pike 160 rc3.blah blah. or whatever on my Norco.
It's a great fork. I think you will like it.
I swore off .r.s stuff a couple years ago after seal issues with a boxxer but after a few test rides I had to have it.
Fox 32 should be reserved for children and small women.
Friggin noodles.. might as well run rigid. .
Everyone I have talked to with a fox 34 hates the damping..
I have a pike 160 rc3.blah blah. or whatever on my Norco.
It's a great fork. I think you will like it.
I swore off .r.s stuff a couple years ago after seal issues with a boxxer but after a few test rides I had to have it.
Fox 32 should be reserved for children and small women.
Friggin noodles.. might as well run rigid. .
Everyone I have talked to with a fox 34 hates the damping..
I haven't ridden in forever but I've had a few fox 34's come through my garage and they are just F@#$EN junk. There is just waaaayyy to much valving and tight areas that oil has to squeeze through (way over valved as is also the case with everything but the newest CTD's) and it just can't do it quickly enough to be smooth.
That said, please tell me why you guys that switched to RS aren't running Float/Talas 36. Those things are steady as a rock (said the 145pound rider) and smooth as butter, ....in my experience.
.
What is your bike? Was it designed to be sold with that exact fork or are there others with that same offset?
Do you know commpairatively how much offset a Fox 36 has?
So i have a Mojo HD frame waiting for me if can ever get past these disabilities. I was planning on putting aTalas 36 on it. I have no idea what the offset of the fork is and no clue what offset the bike was built for <<<aaahh duuhh scratchinghead>>>,...any thoughts??