• There has been a recent cluster of spammers accessing BARFer accounts and posting spam. To safeguard your account, please consider changing your password. It would be even better to take the additional step of enabling 2 Factor Authentication (2FA) on your BARF account. Read more here.

....and now Loius C.K

Hey, remember when it was cool to criticize Pence for trying to avoid ANY semblance of impropriety with females? Remember when we just "knew" it was because he was being sexist or misogynist etc, and anyone who said "hey, maybe he's just trying to cover his ass because a single accusation can ruin your career, let alone several...".

He just might have been on to something there. Maybe.
 
Hey, remember when it was cool to criticize Pence for trying to avoid ANY semblance of impropriety with females? Remember when we just "knew" it was because he was being sexist or misogynist etc, and anyone who said "hey, maybe he's just trying to cover his ass because a single accusation can ruin your career, let alone several...".

He just might have been on to something there. Maybe.

Yeah. He’s probably ruined a career or two using the same tactic....

:twofinger
 
Hey, remember when it was cool to criticize Pence for trying to avoid ANY semblance of impropriety with females? Remember when we just "knew" it was because he was being sexist or misogynist etc, and anyone who said "hey, maybe he's just trying to cover his ass because a single accusation can ruin your career, let alone several...".

He just might have been on to something there. Maybe.
I'm no Pence, but for many years I took similar precautions even before the consent revocation trend. Always met in public in places in which I was known for a first meet. Always with witnesses for any play meet.

Then it came off the rails and threatened to endanger my witnesses. Eff that.
 
Yeah. He’s probably ruined a career or two using the same tactic....

:twofinger

:laughing

I’m just sitting here like, it seems like either way you’re fucked in the court of public opinion. You can’t please everyone, and the Internet gives a voice to everyone.
 
:laughing

I’m just sitting here like, it seems like either way you’re fucked in the court of public opinion. You can’t please everyone, and the Internet gives a voice to everyone.
Unfortunate but true.

Remember the guy that shot up a pizza parlor because of internet rumors?
 
:laughing

I’m just sitting here like, it seems like either way you’re fucked in the court of public opinion. You can’t please everyone, and the Internet gives a voice to everyone.

Unless you’re a Rep from Alabama then those teenage girls are all loose liars trying to pull a great man down.
 
Hey, remember when it was cool to criticize Pence for trying to avoid ANY semblance of impropriety with females? Remember when we just "knew" it was because he was being sexist or misogynist etc, and anyone who said "hey, maybe he's just trying to cover his ass because a single accusation can ruin your career, let alone several...".

He just might have been on to something there. Maybe.
Maybe he's not even interested in him....stranger things have happened... :twofinger
 
Nice to see the discourse on this website from the usual suspects is still as elevated as it ever was.

Keep up the good work :thumbup


:twofinger
 
Nice to see you cruise into a thread, drop an irrelevant turd, then run away as per usual. :twofinger
You mean like those dog owners who walk their dogs to other people's lawns to shit and piss, not picking up after their little 'darlings', then walk back to their own house? :thumbdown
 
Nice to see you cruise into a thread, drop an irrelevant turd, then run away as per usual. :twofinger

Well, it seems to be what we are stuck with because calling out assholes is frouned upon on this website. :dunno
 
Well, it seems to be what we are stuck with because calling out assholes is frouned upon on this website. :dunno
Did you have something to add to this thread or are you just going to make a rules-lawyer-deniable statement about assholes then run and hide under the skirts again?

You have a reputation for criticizing without adding to the conversation, you know. If you really wanted to call people assholes you would do so. But you never do directly...funny, that.
 
Did you have something to add to this thread or are you just going to make a rules-lawyer-deniable statement about assholes then run and hide under the skirts again?

You have a reputation for criticizing without adding to the conversation, you know. If you really wanted to call people assholes you would do so. But you never do directly...funny, that.

One must always remember he has only a public school education. Make allowances. : |

Note the spelling of frown, for example.
 
Hey, remember when it was cool to criticize Pence for trying to avoid ANY semblance of impropriety with females? Remember when we just "knew" it was because he was being sexist or misogynist etc, and anyone who said "hey, maybe he's just trying to cover his ass because a single accusation can ruin your career, let alone several...".

He just might have been on to something there. Maybe.

Nah, If it were just the strange things about being near women, then maybe.
Pence is just this side of wearing magic underwear in terms of religious belief. Which in itself is fine, though I'm generally wary of religious people in government.
 
Can you do it without name calling? There isn’t a secret recipe to staying in good standing on this forum.....

So if a person admits to being a racist fuckface what is the politically correct terminology of describing them? There are a couple here who continually post their unmitigated hatred for anyone of the Muslim faith and I’d just like to know how I can address them as the whining fucking cunts they are without getting into trouble. Maybe the mod corps can help us with our dilemma?
 
If you can't win an argument without calling names, then you have a losing argument. Surely, if somebody is a racist, you are capable of explaining why his ideas are bad. Even if you can't convince him, you can explain why his ideas lack merit, and rational people will agree.

Until the next guy wanders in with the same, already dismissed ideas, and demands that they be again considered as new, and valid, and worthy of consideration and debate. Repeat for 50-75 years. And then play the victim when you don’t have a platform to speak from.
 
One must always remember he has only a public school education. Make allowances. : |

Note the spelling of frown, for example.

Yeah. Darn public schools don't offer "How to be smug on the internet" at the graduate level. Shucks.
 
So if a person admits to being a racist fuckface what is the politically correct terminology of describing them? There are a couple here who continually post their unmitigated hatred for anyone of the Muslim faith and I’d just like to know how I can address them as the whining fucking cunts racists they are without getting into trouble. Maybe the mod corps can help us with our dilemma?

You were so close.... : |
 
Being famous fucks people up.
Getting there does the same it seems
 
Back
Top